From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V8 0/17] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 11:32:15 +0300 Message-ID: <4FA7888F.80505@redhat.com> References: <20120502100610.13206.40.sendpatchset@codeblue.in.ibm.com> <20120507082928.GI16608@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , X86 , KVM , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Andi Kleen , "H. Peter Anvin" , Stefano Stabellini , Xen Devel , Raghavendra K T , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Thomas Gleixner , Virtualization , Greg Kroah-Hartman , LKML , Attilio Rao , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Stephan Diestelhorst To: Ingo Molnar Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120507082928.GI16608@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 05/07/2012 11:29 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > This is looking pretty good and complete now - any objections > from anyone to trying this out in a separate x86 topic tree? No objections, instead an Acked-by: Avi Kivity -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function