From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: X86: Remove stale values from ctxt->memop before emulation
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 13:18:01 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FA7A159.8050109@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120507101225.GH4687@amd.com>
On 05/07/2012 01:12 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 11:21:52AM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> > > index d4bf50c..1b516ec 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> > > @@ -3937,6 +3937,7 @@ int x86_decode_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, void *insn, int insn_len)
> > > struct opcode opcode;
> > >
> > > ctxt->memop.type = OP_NONE;
> > > + ctxt->memop.val = 0;
> > > ctxt->memopp = NULL;
> > > ctxt->_eip = ctxt->eip;
> > > ctxt->fetch.start = ctxt->_eip;
> >
> > This only works for long sized values - it doesn't initialize val64 on
> > i386, for example. So I think it's better to change bsr (and family) to
> > use emualte_2op_SrcV_nobyte() instead (which has the added benefit of
> > using the same values as the processor for the "undefined" bits).
>
> Right, thats a better solution. How about the attached patch? The zf
> check shouldn't be necessary anymore because the generated assembly uses
> dst.val as input and output so writeback shouldn't do anything wrong.
> The bsr and bsf unittests all pass again with this patch.
>
> Joerg
>
> From e9262f18e90111d32b584084c0b5564cbd728d65 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
> Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 12:05:28 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] KVM: X86: convert bsf/bsr instructions to
> emulate_2op_SrcV_nobyte()
>
> The instruction emulation for bsrw is broken in KVM because
> the code always uses bsr with 32 or 64 bit operand size for
> emulation. Fix that by using emulate_2op_SrcV_nobyte() macro
> to use guest operand size for emulation.
>
It looks fine. Do you know what triggered this regression? (for
figuring out if it's 3.4 material)
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-07 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-04 16:14 [PATCH] KVM: X86: Remove stale values from ctxt->memop before emulation Joerg Roedel
2012-05-06 8:21 ` Avi Kivity
2012-05-07 10:12 ` Joerg Roedel
2012-05-07 10:18 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2012-05-07 10:43 ` Joerg Roedel
2012-05-14 8:32 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FA7A159.8050109@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox