From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Corey Minyard Subject: Re: Adding an IPMI BMC device to KVM Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 13:53:25 -0500 Message-ID: <4FA81A25.9000701@acm.org> References: <4FA429BA.3040006@acm.org> Reply-To: minyard@acm.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Zhi Yong Wu Return-path: Received: from mail-ob0-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:37244 "EHLO mail-ob0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751486Ab2EGSx2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2012 14:53:28 -0400 Received: by obbtb18 with SMTP id tb18so8641975obb.19 for ; Mon, 07 May 2012 11:53:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/07/2012 10:17 AM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote: > Then should we also emulate one AMM virtual device? one fsp virtual > device? one IVE virtual device? I have no idea what those things are, so I don't know. I don't think I know of any need for them. But vendors have all kinds of crazy names for IPMI. If they are IPMI management controllers, they idea is to allow you to configure the virtual IPMI interface to have the SDRs, sensors, FRU data, etc. that you need to emulate them. That configuration is non-trivial; writing SDRs really sucks. -corey