From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tossati <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
Jens Freimann <jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Heinz Graalfs <graalfs@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] kvm-s390: add capability indicating COW support
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 14:38:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FB24E46.1050600@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FB24D0D.7090707@redhat.com>
On 15/05/12 14:33, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 05/15/2012 03:31 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> On 15/05/12 14:24, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>>> Newer systems allow to write-protect the guest backing memory
>>>> and let the fault be delivered to the host, thus allowing COW.
>>>>
>>>> Use a capability bit to tell qemu if that is possible.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Asking out of ignorance: who is doing the write protection here? The
>>> guest? If so, why is qemu involved?
>>
>> It is about the host doing write protection of guest/user memory (e.g. for
>> dirty pages tracking or KSM)
>
> Ok, so why does qemu^Wuserspace need to know about it?
By default qemu will use MAP_PRIVATE for guest pages. This will write
protect pages and thus break on s390 systems that dont support this feature.
Therefore qemu has a hack to always use MAP_SHARED for s390. But MAP_SHARED
has other problems (no dirty pages tracking, a lot more swap overhead etc.)
With this feature qemu can use the standard qemu alloc if available, otherwise
it will use the old s390 hack. I will put you on cc for the qemu patch :-)
Christian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-15 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-15 12:15 [PATCH 0/4] kvm-s390: feature patches Christian Borntraeger
2012-05-15 12:15 ` [PATCH 1/4] kvm-s390: add capability indicating COW support Christian Borntraeger
2012-05-15 12:24 ` Avi Kivity
2012-05-15 12:31 ` Christian Borntraeger
2012-05-15 12:33 ` Avi Kivity
2012-05-15 12:38 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2012-05-15 12:40 ` Avi Kivity
2012-06-05 12:36 ` Alexander Graf
2012-05-15 12:15 ` [PATCH 2/4] kvm-s390: KVM_GET/SET_ONEREG for s390 Christian Borntraeger
2012-06-05 12:37 ` Alexander Graf
2012-05-15 12:15 ` [PATCH 3/4] kvm-s390: epoch difference and TOD programmable field Christian Borntraeger
2012-06-05 12:40 ` Alexander Graf
2012-05-15 12:15 ` [PATCH 4/4] kvm-s390: onereg for timer related registers Christian Borntraeger
2012-06-05 12:42 ` Alexander Graf
2012-06-05 12:57 ` Christian Borntraeger
2012-06-05 13:03 ` Alexander Graf
2012-05-15 12:26 ` [PATCH 0/4] kvm-s390: feature patches Avi Kivity
2012-05-15 12:34 ` Christian Borntraeger
2012-05-18 0:06 ` Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FB24E46.1050600@de.ibm.com \
--to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cotte@de.ibm.com \
--cc=graalfs@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox