From: Andrew Theurer <habanero@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: gettimeofday() vsyscall for kvm-clock?
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 17:13:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FBABE09.2010604@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120521203642.GA26834@amt.cnet>
On 05/21/2012 03:36 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 03:26:54PM -0500, Andrew Theurer wrote:
>> Wondering if a user-space gettimofday() for kvm-clock has been
>> considered before. I am seeing a pretty large difference in
>> performance between tsc and kvm-clock. I have to assume at least
>> some of this is due to the mode switch for kvm-clock. Here are the
>> results:
>>
>> (this is a 16 vCPU VM on a 16 thread 2S Nehalem-EP host, looped
>> gettimeofday() calls on all vCPUs)
>>
>> tsc: .0645 usec per call
>> kvm-clock: .4222 usec per call (6.54x)
>>
>>
>> -Andrew Theurer
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679207
>
> "model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5540 @ 2.53GHz
>
> native, gettimeofday (vsyscall): 45ns
> guest, kvmclock (syscall): 198ns"
>
> But this was before
>
> commit 489fb490dbf8dab0249ad82b56688ae3842a79e8
> Author: Glauber Costa<glommer@redhat.com>
> Date: Tue May 11 12:17:40 2010 -0400
>
> x86, paravirt: Add a global synchronization point for pvclock
>
> (see the full changelog for details).
>
> Can you try disabling the global variable, to see if that makes
> a difference (should not be enabled in production)? Untested patch
> (against guest kernel) below
The following was re-done on a 3.4 guest kernel (previously RHEL kernel):
1-way:
tsc: .0315
kvm-clock: .2112 (6.7x)
16-way:
tsc: .0432
kvm-clock: .4825 (11.1x)
Now with global var disabled:
16-way:
kvm-clock: .4628
Does not look like much of a difference.
-Andrew
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-21 22:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-21 20:26 gettimeofday() vsyscall for kvm-clock? Andrew Theurer
2012-05-21 20:36 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-05-21 22:13 ` Andrew Theurer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FBABE09.2010604@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=habanero@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).