From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: optimize ISR lookups Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 13:46:35 +0300 Message-ID: <4FBB6E8B.8020200@redhat.com> References: <20120521163727.GA13337@redhat.com> <20120521215127.GH17031@redhat.com> <20120521222449.GJ17031@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Thomas Gleixner Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 05/22/2012 02:01 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > Others are not my fault :) > > > > Seriously, if Avi/Marcelo want to rewrite the ISR emulation > > Interesting POV, really. > > Did you ever notice that the kernel is a collaborative effort and not > controlled by "Avi/Marcelo"? > > Did you ever notice that arch/x86/kvm is part of arch/x86? This is silly. Most of the time the kernel is advanced by incremental patches. Sometimes it is advanced by minor or major refactoring. It is never advanced by personal attacks on contributors. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function