From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/16] net: hub-based networking
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 15:47:28 +0200
Message-ID: <4FBF8D70.1030304@redhat.com>
References: <1337882362-20100-1-git-send-email-zwu.kernel@gmail.com>
	<20120524175321.31254444@doriath.home>
	<20120525100753.GD30110@stefanha-thinkpad.localdomain>
	<m3vcjkfr04.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
	<CAJSP0QW=fkLFaH7PdwOPqwykykE_wf_Wq7w9b+32+-K3sjnk=w@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120525095313.116f680f@doriath.home>
	<4FBF822D.9090707@redhat.com>
	<20120525100746.51d7bf28@doriath.home>
	<4FBF85BF.6050403@redhat.com>
	<20120525101830.1793d300@doriath.home>
	<4FBF86E0.7070908@redhat.com>
	<20120525103004.23cfc4f4@doriath.home>
	<4FBF8B0B.1090601@redhat.com>
	<20120525104322.2da0b0ba@doriath.home>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, zwu.kernel@gmail.com,
	wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jan.kiszka@siemens.com
To: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Return-path: <qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120525104322.2da0b0ba@doriath.home>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org
Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

Il 25/05/2012 15:43, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto:
>> Yeah, VDE probably includes something like an hub.  But then we could
>> drop even "-net socket", "-net udp", "-net dump", and only leave in
>> vde+tap+slirp.  Or even move slirp into VDE. :)  That's a very different
>> thing.
> 
> Let's start with what is hurting us.

But is it?  The patch makes it quite clean.

Paolo