From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Kiszka Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/kvm : Add documentation on Hypercalls Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 20:55:46 +0200 Message-ID: <4FC7BEB2.8000207@siemens.com> References: <20120531080116.24838.15692.sendpatchset@codeblue.in.ibm.com> <4FC7AE15.9040807@xenotime.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Raghavendra K T , Rob Landley , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Alexander Graf , KVM , "H. Peter Anvin" , Marcelo Tosatti , Gleb Natapov , Ingo Molnar , Avi Kivity To: Randy Dunlap Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4FC7AE15.9040807@xenotime.net> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 2012-05-31 19:44, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 05/31/2012 01:01 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote: > >> From: Raghavendra K T >> >> Thanks Alex for KVM_HC_FEATURES inputs and Jan for VAPIC_POLL_IRQ >> >> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T >> --- >> diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/hypercalls.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/hypercalls.txt >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..c79335a >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/hypercalls.txt >> @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ >> +KVM Hypercalls Documentation >> +=========================== >> +The template for each hypercall is: >> +1. Hypercall name, value. >> +2. Architecture(s) >> +3. Status (deprecated, obsolete, active) >> +4. Purpose >> + >> +1. KVM_HC_VAPIC_POLL_IRQ >> +------------------------ >> +Value: 1 >> +Architecture: x86 > > > No "Status", does that imply "Active" ? It should actually state that this call is in use. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux