From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/kvm : Add documentation on Hypercalls Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 11:59:23 -0700 Message-ID: <4FC7BF8B.60201@zytor.com> References: <20120531080116.24838.15692.sendpatchset@codeblue.in.ibm.com> <4FC7AE15.9040807@xenotime.net> <4FC7BEB2.8000207@siemens.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Randy Dunlap , Raghavendra K T , Rob Landley , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Alexander Graf , KVM , Marcelo Tosatti , Gleb Natapov , Ingo Molnar , Avi Kivity To: Jan Kiszka Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4FC7BEB2.8000207@siemens.com> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 05/31/2012 11:55 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> >> No "Status", does that imply "Active" ? > > It should actually state that this call is in use. > It might be nice to point out when a call was introduced, and for deprecated calls, when it was deprecated. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.