From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [RFC 01/10] KVM: reintroduce hc_gpa Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 14:38:57 +0300 Message-ID: <4FCF4151.5090505@redhat.com> References: <1338980418-2519-1-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com> <4FCF39C4.3050906@redhat.com> <1338982331.3292.61.camel@lappy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: mtosatti@redhat.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com, dan.magenheimer@oracle.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Sasha Levin Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47243 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750897Ab2FFLjG (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jun 2012 07:39:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1338982331.3292.61.camel@lappy> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/06/2012 02:32 PM, Sasha Levin wrote: > >> and benchmark results. > > Is there a specific test you'd like to see? My tests were based around > the "streaming test" you proposed last time this discussion came up, and > runs of 'fio' in guests. Those are fine, thanks. btw, IIUC, a guest can have two tmem providers: the hypervisor and zcache. How does it choose? -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function