From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: 1.1 release?
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 10:13:45 +0300
Message-ID: <4FD054A9.5040605@redhat.com>
References: <4FD053C9.6020903@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:30708 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752991Ab2FGHN7 (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 7 Jun 2012 03:13:59 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4FD053C9.6020903@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 06/07/2012 10:10 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Are there any issues with 1.1 release of qemu-kvm?
> 
> The RCs were followed qemu RCs quite closely, but
> the final 1.1 is still not released, anything wrong
> with it?

Yes, there is a regression with IDE PIO that can hang a guest on boot.
We don't think it's a data corruptor, but I'd rather see it fixed before
a release.


-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function