From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Subject: Re: 1.1 release?
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 11:19:32 +0400
Message-ID: <4FD05604.90300@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
References: <4FD053C9.6020903@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <4FD054A9.5040605@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from isrv.corpit.ru ([86.62.121.231]:38644 "EHLO isrv.corpit.ru"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751250Ab2FGHTd (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 7 Jun 2012 03:19:33 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4FD054A9.5040605@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 07.06.2012 11:13, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 06/07/2012 10:10 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> Are there any issues with 1.1 release of qemu-kvm?
[]
> Yes, there is a regression with IDE PIO that can hang a guest on boot.

Any pointers on this?

I were testing 1.1-rc with various guests and it all works more or
less okay so far, but I didn't try pio mode.

> We don't think it's a data corruptor, but I'd rather see it fixed before
> a release.

Yes, that'd be nice.

Thanks,

/mjt