From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: 1.1 release? Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 10:27:45 +0300 Message-ID: <4FD057F1.3090900@redhat.com> References: <4FD053C9.6020903@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <4FD054A9.5040605@redhat.com> <4FD05604.90300@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: KVM list To: Michael Tokarev Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:63584 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751250Ab2FGH1t (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2012 03:27:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4FD05604.90300@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/07/2012 10:19 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote: > On 07.06.2012 11:13, Avi Kivity wrote: >> On 06/07/2012 10:10 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote: >>> Are there any issues with 1.1 release of qemu-kvm? > [] >> Yes, there is a regression with IDE PIO that can hang a guest on boot. > > Any pointers on this? See the thread started by Yongjie Ren. > > I were testing 1.1-rc with various guests and it all works more or > less okay so far, but I didn't try pio mode. > The bios uses it. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function