From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: align ram_size to page boundary Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 16:14:00 +0300 Message-ID: <4FDDD818.4030700@redhat.com> References: <1339922831-23002-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> <4FDDB981.8070309@web.de> <4FDDBFCD.3000608@redhat.com> <4FDDC3C8.5020205@web.de> <4FDDC4B6.5030202@redhat.com> <4FDDD39D.9090800@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Michael Tokarev , Marcelo Tosatti , Jan Kiszka , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Blue Swirl Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 06/17/2012 04:06 PM, Blue Swirl wrote: >> strtosz() is much too general. We could do it in vl.c without trouble. >> However, it takes away our ability to emulate a "640k should be enough >> for everyone" machine. > > Then how about current max of target page sizes: 8k? No machine should > want less than that. Okay by me, but I can hear the we-should-have-a-generic-mechanism crowd charging their megaphone batteries. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function