From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] KVM: introduce gfn_to_hva_read/kvm_read_hva/kvm_read_hva_atomic
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 13:16:37 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FDF0005.3050300@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FD6AE1B.7080501@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 06/12/2012 05:48 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> This set of functions is only used to read data from host space, read is
> a special case in the later patch
>
>
> +/*
> + * The hva returned by this function is only allowed to be read.
> + * It should pair with kvm_read_hva() or kvm_read_hva_atomic().
> + */
> +static unsigned long gfn_to_hva_read(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn)
> +{
> + return gfn_to_hva_many(gfn_to_memslot(kvm, gfn), gfn, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +static int kvm_read_hva(void *data, void *hva, int len)
> +{
> + return __copy_from_user(data, (void __user *)hva, len);
> +
> +}
> +
> +static int kvm_read_hva_atomic(void *data, void *hva, int len)
> +{
> + return __copy_from_user_inatomic(data, (void __user *)hva, len);
> +
> +}
Why cast to __user? Make it __user in the first place.
Also these are just simple wrappers, why to them at all?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-18 10:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-12 2:47 [PATCH v3 1/6] KVM: fix missing check for memslot flags Xiao Guangrong
2012-06-12 2:47 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: hide KVM_MEMSLOT_INVALID from userspace Xiao Guangrong
2012-06-12 2:47 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] KVM: introduce gfn_to_pfn_memslot_atomic Xiao Guangrong
2012-06-12 2:48 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] KVM: pass slot to hva_to_pfn Xiao Guangrong
2012-06-18 10:15 ` Avi Kivity
2012-06-19 2:17 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-06-12 2:48 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] KVM: introduce gfn_to_hva_read/kvm_read_hva/kvm_read_hva_atomic Xiao Guangrong
2012-06-18 10:16 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2012-06-19 2:24 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-06-12 2:49 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] KVM: introduce readonly memslot Xiao Guangrong
2012-06-16 2:11 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-06-18 3:11 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-06-18 9:50 ` Avi Kivity
2012-06-18 20:25 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-06-19 7:20 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-06-19 8:11 ` Avi Kivity
2012-06-18 10:11 ` Avi Kivity
2012-06-19 2:14 ` Xiao Guangrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FDF0005.3050300@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).