From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Xiao Guangrong Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] KVM: pass slot to hva_to_pfn Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:17:49 +0800 Message-ID: <4FDFE14D.5060509@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <4FD6ADA6.40008@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4FD6ADF6.2030802@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4FDEFFCA.7060403@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , LKML , KVM To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from e23smtp07.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.140]:48162 "EHLO e23smtp07.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753755Ab2FSCSF (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jun 2012 22:18:05 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp07.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 02:09:04 +1000 In-Reply-To: <4FDEFFCA.7060403@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/18/2012 06:15 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 06/12/2012 05:48 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote: >> This parameter will be used in the later patch >> >> >> - return hva_to_pfn(kvm, addr, atomic, async, write_fault, writable); >> + return hva_to_pfn(kvm, slot, addr, atomic, async, write_fault, >> + writable); >> } >> >> pfn_t gfn_to_pfn_atomic(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn) >> @@ -1205,7 +1210,7 @@ pfn_t gfn_to_pfn_memslot(struct kvm *kvm, >> struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn) >> { >> unsigned long addr = gfn_to_hva_memslot(slot, gfn); >> - return hva_to_pfn(kvm, addr, false, NULL, true, NULL); >> + return hva_to_pfn(kvm, slot, addr, false, NULL, true, NULL); >> } >> >> pfn_t gfn_to_pfn_memslot_atomic(struct kvm *kvm, >> @@ -1213,7 +1218,7 @@ pfn_t gfn_to_pfn_memslot_atomic(struct kvm *kvm, >> { >> unsigned long addr = gfn_to_hva_memslot(slot, gfn); >> >> - return hva_to_pfn(kvm, addr, true, NULL, true, NULL); >> + return hva_to_pfn(kvm, slot, addr, true, NULL, true, NULL); >> } > > It was unreadable before, but now it's even more unreadable. Hmm, i will simplify hva_to_pfn() in the next version.