From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, mtosatti@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 4/5] KVM: emulator: move linearize() out of emulator code.
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:50:06 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FE888AE.80801@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120625153544.GC2596@redhat.com>
On 06/25/2012 06:35 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>
>> Agree. Though the security issue is limited; the structure won't be
>> uninitialized, it would retain values from the previous call. So it's
>> limited to intra-guest vulnerabilities.
>>
> Yes, that's the kind I mean, not host crash. Intra-guest vulnerabilities
> should not be taken lightly. From guest POV they are like buggy CPUs
> that allows privilege escalation.
It's a smaller disaster; I didn't mean to minimize those issues.
>
>> >
>> >> Later we can extend x86_decode_insn() and the other
>> >> functions to follow the same rule.
>> >>
>> > What rule? We cannot not initialize a context. You can reduce things
>> > that should be initialized to minimum (getting GP registers on demand,
>> > etc), but still some initialization is needed since ctxt holds emulation
>> > state and it needs to be reset before each emulation.
>>
>> An alternative is to use two contexts, the base context only holds ops
>> and is the parameter to all the callbacks on the non-state APIs, the
>> derived context holds the state:
>>
>> struct x86_emulation_ctxt {
>> struct x86_ops *ops;
>> /* state that always needs to be initialized, preferablt none */
>> };
>>
>> struct x86_insn_ctxt {
>> struct x86_emulation_ctxt em;
>> /* instruction state */
>> }
>>
>> and so we have a compile-time split between users of the state and
>> non-users.
>>
> I do not understand how you will divide current ctxt structure between
> those two.
>
> Where will you put those for instance: interruptibility, have_exception,
> perm_ok, only_vendor_specific_insn and how can they not be initialized
> before each instruction emulation?
x86_emulate_ops::get_interruptibility()
x86_emulate_ops::set_interruptibility()
x86_emulate_ops::exception()
x86_decode_insn(struct x86_insn_ctxt *ctxt, unsigned flags)
{
ctxt->flags = flags;
ctxt->perm_ok = false;
}
In short, instruction emulation state is only seen by instruction
emulation functions, the others don't get to see it.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-25 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-12 12:01 [PATCHv2 0/5] improve speed of "rep ins" emulation Gleb Natapov
2012-06-12 12:01 ` [PATCHv2 1/5] Provide userspace IO exit completion callback Gleb Natapov
2012-06-29 0:51 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-07-01 8:15 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-06-12 12:01 ` [PATCHv2 2/5] KVM: emulator: make x86 emulation modes enum instead of defines Gleb Natapov
2012-06-12 12:01 ` [PATCHv2 3/5] KVM: emulator: move some address manipulation function out of emulator code Gleb Natapov
2012-06-12 12:01 ` [PATCHv2 4/5] KVM: emulator: move linearize() " Gleb Natapov
2012-06-24 13:12 ` Avi Kivity
2012-06-24 13:27 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-06-24 13:39 ` Avi Kivity
2012-06-24 14:27 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-06-25 12:57 ` Avi Kivity
2012-06-25 13:12 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-06-25 13:40 ` Avi Kivity
2012-06-25 14:17 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-06-25 14:32 ` Avi Kivity
2012-06-25 14:55 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-06-25 15:03 ` Avi Kivity
2012-06-25 15:35 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-06-25 15:50 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2012-06-26 8:30 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-06-26 9:19 ` Avi Kivity
2012-06-12 12:01 ` [PATCHv2 5/5] KVM: Provide fast path for "rep ins" emulation if possible Gleb Natapov
2012-06-29 22:26 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-07-01 11:24 ` Gleb Natapov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FE888AE.80801@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).