kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, mtosatti@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 4/5] KVM: emulator: move linearize() out of emulator code.
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:50:06 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FE888AE.80801@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120625153544.GC2596@redhat.com>

On 06/25/2012 06:35 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>> 
>> Agree.  Though the security issue is limited; the structure won't be
>> uninitialized, it would retain values from the previous call.  So it's
>> limited to intra-guest vulnerabilities.
>> 
> Yes, that's the kind I mean, not host crash. Intra-guest vulnerabilities
> should not be taken lightly. From guest POV they are like buggy CPUs
> that allows privilege escalation.

It's a smaller disaster; I didn't mean to minimize those issues.

> 
>> > 
>> >>              Later we can extend x86_decode_insn() and the other
>> >> functions to follow the same rule.
>> >> 
>> > What rule? We cannot not initialize a context. You can reduce things
>> > that should be initialized to minimum (getting GP registers on demand,
>> > etc), but still some initialization is needed since ctxt holds emulation
>> > state and it needs to be reset before each emulation.
>> 
>> An alternative is to use two contexts, the base context only holds ops
>> and is the parameter to all the callbacks on the non-state APIs, the
>> derived context holds the state:
>> 
>> struct x86_emulation_ctxt {
>>     struct x86_ops *ops;
>>     /* state that always needs to be initialized, preferablt none */
>> };
>> 
>> struct x86_insn_ctxt {
>>     struct x86_emulation_ctxt em;
>>     /* instruction state */
>> }
>> 
>> and so we have a compile-time split between users of the state and
>> non-users.
>> 
> I do not understand how you will divide current ctxt structure between
> those two.
> 
> Where will you put those for instance: interruptibility, have_exception,
> perm_ok, only_vendor_specific_insn and how can they not be initialized
> before each instruction emulation?

x86_emulate_ops::get_interruptibility()
x86_emulate_ops::set_interruptibility()
x86_emulate_ops::exception()

x86_decode_insn(struct x86_insn_ctxt *ctxt, unsigned flags)
{
    ctxt->flags = flags;
    ctxt->perm_ok = false;
}

In short, instruction emulation state is only seen by instruction
emulation functions, the others don't get to see it.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function



  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-25 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-12 12:01 [PATCHv2 0/5] improve speed of "rep ins" emulation Gleb Natapov
2012-06-12 12:01 ` [PATCHv2 1/5] Provide userspace IO exit completion callback Gleb Natapov
2012-06-29  0:51   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-07-01  8:15     ` Gleb Natapov
2012-06-12 12:01 ` [PATCHv2 2/5] KVM: emulator: make x86 emulation modes enum instead of defines Gleb Natapov
2012-06-12 12:01 ` [PATCHv2 3/5] KVM: emulator: move some address manipulation function out of emulator code Gleb Natapov
2012-06-12 12:01 ` [PATCHv2 4/5] KVM: emulator: move linearize() " Gleb Natapov
2012-06-24 13:12   ` Avi Kivity
2012-06-24 13:27     ` Gleb Natapov
2012-06-24 13:39       ` Avi Kivity
2012-06-24 14:27         ` Gleb Natapov
2012-06-25 12:57           ` Avi Kivity
2012-06-25 13:12             ` Gleb Natapov
2012-06-25 13:40               ` Avi Kivity
2012-06-25 14:17                 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-06-25 14:32                   ` Avi Kivity
2012-06-25 14:55                     ` Gleb Natapov
2012-06-25 15:03                       ` Avi Kivity
2012-06-25 15:35                         ` Gleb Natapov
2012-06-25 15:50                           ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2012-06-26  8:30                             ` Gleb Natapov
2012-06-26  9:19                               ` Avi Kivity
2012-06-12 12:01 ` [PATCHv2 5/5] KVM: Provide fast path for "rep ins" emulation if possible Gleb Natapov
2012-06-29 22:26   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-07-01 11:24     ` Gleb Natapov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FE888AE.80801@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).