From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Android-virt] [PATCH v9 16/16] ARM: KVM: Guest wait-for-interrupts
 (WFI) support
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 16:24:24 +0300
Message-ID: <4FF2F288.4020502@redhat.com>
References: <20120703085841.27746.82730.stgit@ubuntu> <20120703090212.27746.39517.stgit@ubuntu> <4FF2EF5F.8070207@redhat.com> <CAFEAcA8TUgn_t2mA6eoDNWn4wGj5B_GPZNKH6bh9gDLuYoGdCw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Christoffer Dall <c.dall@virtualopensystems.com>,
	tech@virtualopensystems.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	android-virt@lists.cs.columbia.edu
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57311 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750720Ab2GCNYg (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 3 Jul 2012 09:24:36 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA8TUgn_t2mA6eoDNWn4wGj5B_GPZNKH6bh9gDLuYoGdCw@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 07/03/2012 04:14 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 3 July 2012 14:10, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Or you could just call kvm_vcpu_block() here without having the
>> variable.  But eventually you'll need it since you want to expose wfi
>> state to userspace for live migration.
> 
> You could just always wake the cpu when migrating: the
> architecture allows WFI to return early for any reason
> it likes including implementation convenience.

Seems reasonable.

I imagine wfi works with interrupts disabled, unlike the x86 silliness?


-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function