kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
To: "pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	"Annapurve, Vishal" <vannapurve@google.com>,
	"seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>,
	"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Li, Xiaoyao" <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
	"Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>,
	"Zhao, Yan Y" <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>,
	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"tony.lindgren@linux.intel.com" <tony.lindgren@linux.intel.com>,
	"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	"kas@kernel.org" <kas@kernel.org>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Yamahata, Isaku" <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>,
	"binbin.wu@linux.intel.com" <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>,
	"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>, "Gao, Chao" <chao.gao@intel.com>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] x86/tdx: Eliminate duplicate code in tdx_clear_page()
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 14:44:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4b7190de91c59a5d5b3fdbb39174e4e48c69f9e7.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ee2f8d16-be3c-403e-8b9c-e5bec6d010ce@intel.com>

On Wed, 2025-07-23 at 17:37 +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> > The latter seems better to me for the sake of less churn.
> 
> Why make tdx_quirk_reset_page() and tdx_quirk_reset_paddr() follow
> different rules.
> 
> How about this:
> 
> From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] x86/tdx: Tidy reset_pamt functions
> 
> Rename reset_pamt functions to contain "quirk" to reflect the new
> functionality, and remove the now misleading comment.

This looks like the "former" option. Churn is not too bad, and it has the
benefit of clear code vs long comment. I'm ok either way. But it needs to go
cleanup first in the patch order.

The log should explain why it's ok to change now, with respect to the reasoning
in the comment that is being removed.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-23 14:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-23 12:05 [PATCH V4 0/2] x86/tdx: Skip clearing reclaimed pages unless X86_BUG_TDX_PW_MCE is present Adrian Hunter
2025-07-23 12:05 ` [PATCH V4 1/2] x86/tdx: Eliminate duplicate code in tdx_clear_page() Adrian Hunter
2025-07-23 14:06   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-07-23 14:37     ` Adrian Hunter
2025-07-23 14:44       ` Edgecombe, Rick P [this message]
2025-07-23 15:30         ` Adrian Hunter
2025-07-23 15:33           ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-07-23 15:41             ` Adrian Hunter
2025-07-23 16:03               ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-07-23 23:01           ` Huang, Kai
2025-07-23 23:26             ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-07-23 23:56               ` Huang, Kai
2025-07-23 15:57   ` Sean Christopherson
2025-07-23 12:05 ` [PATCH V4 2/2] x86/tdx: Skip clearing reclaimed pages unless X86_BUG_TDX_PW_MCE is present Adrian Hunter
2025-07-23 12:31   ` Xiaoyao Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4b7190de91c59a5d5b3fdbb39174e4e48c69f9e7.camel@intel.com \
    --to=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kas@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.lindgren@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vannapurve@google.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    --cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).