From: "Kalra, Ashish" <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 2/5] x86/sev: Disable CPU hotplug while SNP is active
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 17:46:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4d095cd6-a716-46aa-aff2-e7533d1511b0@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260910222518.AB5191F000FF@smtp.kernel.org>
On 9/10/2026 5:25 PM, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [High] System suspend/resume bypasses cpu_hotplug_disable() and brings CPUs online without SnpEn set, breaking the SNP invariant.
> --
>
> commit 0243c46e8f299e3de42fbcddbc4c7bd93fb68c65
> Author: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
>
> x86/sev: Disable CPU hotplug while SNP is active
>
> This commit disables CPU hotplug while SEV-SNP is active. This ensures no
> CPU can be brought online without the SnpEn bit set in MSR_AMD64_SYSCFG,
> which is required for hardware RMP checks to function correctly.
>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
>> index cff285d8ad8e3..558f7924a3f85 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
>> @@ -526,14 +525,18 @@ int snp_prepare(void)
>>
>> clear_rmp();
>>
>> - cpus_read_lock();
>> + /*
>> + * No CPU may come online without SnpEn while SNP is active; disable
>> + * hotplug here and re-enable it in snp_shutdown().
>> + */
>> + cpu_hotplug_disable();
>
> [Severity: High]
> Does system suspend/resume bypass cpu_hotplug_disable() and bring CPUs online
> without SnpEn set, breaking the SNP invariant?
>
> If the host initiates an ACPI system suspend (e.g., S3), freeze_secondary_cpus()
> offlines all secondary CPUs via _cpu_down(), which bypasses the
> cpu_hotplug_disabled counter incremented by cpu_hotplug_disable().
>
> Upon resume, thaw_secondary_cpus() brings the CPUs back online via _cpu_up().
> Because CPU MSR state is lost during power-off in suspend and snp_enable() is
> not registered as a CPU hotplug callback, the secondary CPUs wake up with SnpEn
> cleared. This would allow them to bypass hardware RMP checks.
>
You're right that the suspend path bypasses cpu_hotplug_disable() — freeze_secondary_cpus() uses _cpu_down() directly and ignores the cpu_hotplug_disabled counter. But this is neither introduced nor affected by this patch, and does not apply to SNP hosts:
1. This patch does not touch the suspend/resume path. cpu_hotplug_disable() holds the online CPU set stable against the regular (sysfs) hotplug path while SNP is active. The cpus_read_lock() this patch replaces did not gate the freeze/thaw path either, so suspend/resume behaviour is unchanged from base SNP.
2. SNP hosts do not support system suspend/resume. It is not a supported configuration for an SNP‑enabled host, and there is no path today to re‑establish the per‑CPU SNP state (SnpEn) on resume — snp_enable() has never been registered as a CPU‑hotplug/resume callback. That is a pre‑existing property of base SNP, independent of this series.
Thanks,
Ashish
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-10 22:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-10 21:58 [PATCH v14 0/5] Add RMPOPT support Ashish Kalra
2026-09-10 21:59 ` [PATCH v14 1/5] x86/cpufeatures: Add X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT feature flag Ashish Kalra
2026-09-10 21:59 ` [PATCH v14 2/5] x86/sev: Disable CPU hotplug while SNP is active Ashish Kalra
2026-09-10 22:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-10 22:46 ` Kalra, Ashish [this message]
2026-09-10 21:59 ` [PATCH v14 3/5] x86/sev: Initialize RMPOPT configuration MSRs Ashish Kalra
2026-09-10 22:00 ` [PATCH v14 4/5] x86/sev: Perform RMP optimizations asynchronously Ashish Kalra
2026-09-10 22:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-10 22:40 ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-09-12 1:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-09-10 22:00 ` [PATCH v14 5/5] x86/sev: Re-enable RMP optimizations on SNP guest shutdown Ashish Kalra
2026-09-10 22:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-10 23:10 ` Kalra, Ashish
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4d095cd6-a716-46aa-aff2-e7533d1511b0@amd.com \
--to=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox