public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, thuth@redhat.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, david@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 4/7] s390x: smp: Rework cpu start and active tracking
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 15:44:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4e4587a6-efba-6f40-306b-3704e53aafc3@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200116151453.186cbf94.cohuck@redhat.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2035 bytes --]

On 1/16/20 3:14 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 07:05:10 -0500
> Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
>> sigp is not synchronous on all hypervisors, so we need to wait until
> 
> "The architecture specifies that processing sigp orders may be
> asynchronous, and this is indeed the case on some hypervisors, so..."
> 
> ? (Or is that overkill?)
> 
>> the cpu runs until we return from the setup/start function.
> 
> s/until we return/before we return/
> 
>>
>> As there was a lot of duplicate code a common function for cpu
> 
> s/code/code,/
> 
>> restarts has been intropduced.
> 
> s/intropduced/introduced/
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>  lib/s390x/smp.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/s390x/smp.c b/lib/s390x/smp.c
>> index f57f420..f984a34 100644
>> --- a/lib/s390x/smp.c
>> +++ b/lib/s390x/smp.c
>> @@ -104,35 +104,41 @@ int smp_cpu_stop_store_status(uint16_t addr)
>>  	return rc;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static int smp_cpu_restart_nolock(uint16_t addr, struct psw *psw)
>> +{
>> +	int rc;
>> +	struct cpu *cpu = smp_cpu_from_addr(addr);
>> +
>> +	if (!cpu)
>> +		return -1;
>> +	if (psw) {
>> +		cpu->lowcore->restart_new_psw.mask = psw->mask;
>> +		cpu->lowcore->restart_new_psw.addr = psw->addr;
>> +	}
>> +	rc = sigp(addr, SIGP_RESTART, 0, NULL);
>> +	if (rc)
>> +		return rc;
>> +	while (!smp_cpu_running(addr)) { mb(); }
> 
> Maybe split this statement? Also, maybe add a comment

/* Wait until the target cpu is running */
?

This is not QEMU with two line ifs taking up 3 lines :)

> 
> /*
>  * The order has been accepted, but the actual restart may not
>  * have been performed yet, so wait until the cpu is running.
>  */
> 
> ?
> 
>> +	cpu->active = true;
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
> 
> The changes look good to me AFAICS.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>

Thanks!



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-16 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-16 12:05 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/7] s390x: smp: Improve smp code and reset checks Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:05 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 1/7] s390x: smp: Cleanup smp.c Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:13   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-16 13:01     ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:05 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 2/7] s390x: smp: Only use smp_cpu_setup once Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:18   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-16 13:01     ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:05 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 3/7] s390x: Add cpu id to interrupt error prints Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:17   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-16 13:04     ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 13:19       ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-16 13:59   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-01-16 14:11     ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:05 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 4/7] s390x: smp: Rework cpu start and active tracking Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 14:14   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-01-16 14:44     ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2020-01-16 15:05       ` Cornelia Huck
2020-01-16 12:05 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 5/7] s390x: smp: Wait for cpu setup to finish Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:19   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-16 12:05 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 6/7] s390x: smp: Test all CRs on initial reset Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:24   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-16 13:07     ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 13:18       ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-16 12:05 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 7/7] s390x: smp: Dirty fpc before initial reset test Janosch Frank
2020-01-17 10:20   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-17 10:29     ` Thomas Huth
2020-01-17 10:41       ` Janosch Frank

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4e4587a6-efba-6f40-306b-3704e53aafc3@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox