From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kirti Wankhede Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/22] Add Mediated device support Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 12:06:20 +0530 Message-ID: <4effe29e-98ef-cacd-75fa-35d4e7ed6457@nvidia.com> References: <1478293856-8191-1-git-send-email-kwankhede@nvidia.com> <40bfdbe9-1070-b5e6-fba2-6b97999b558b@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , , , , , To: Alexey Kardashevskiy , , , , Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 11/7/2016 11:45 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > On 07/11/16 14:59, Kirti Wankhede wrote: >> >> >> On 11/7/2016 9:00 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >>> On 05/11/16 08:10, Kirti Wankhede wrote: ... >>>> >>>> Patch series tested with linux-next upto commit 14970f204b19 @Fri Oct 28 >>>> Resolved against conflicting change: >>> >>> Patch 11/22 does not apply if the patchset is applied on top of 14970f204b19. >>> >>> >> >> Pull commit 05692d7005a3 (below) commit. > > Nah, it was my fault, thunderbird's plugin saved mails in wrong order, > false alarm, sorry. > > Speaking of order, 11/22 is better be squashed into 02/22 (as it does not > seem to make sense alone; it also does not depend on something between > 02/22 and 11/22); and both 01/22 and 02/22 better be moved where "docs" > patches start as they do not makes sense earlier anyway, or do they? > > There are dependencies in the patch series: Patch 10/22 depends on patch 01/22 and patch 03/22 to 09/22 patch. Patch 02/22 depends on patch 01/22. Patch 11/22 doesn't make sense without patch 10/22. Patch 12/22 depends on patch 11/22. Patch 13/22 to 18/22 are independent, pulling common code in functions. But patch 21/22 uses these APIs in sample driver, so has to be before that. Patch 19/22 adds basic documentation. Patch 21/22 depends on 19/22 patch because that adds sample driver and its explanation to documentation. Thanks, Kirti