From: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: selftests: arm64: Skip sea_to_user without 1GB hugepages
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 20:49:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f7023b4-dd7a-47cb-9754-52e6d41d3aa1@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260818113615.5CBE01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
On 8/18/26 7:36 PM, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [Medium] get_free_hugepages() overestimates available hugepages by ignoring reserved pages, which allows the test to proceed and crash with ENOMEM on systems with reserved pools.
> --
>
> --- Patch [2]: [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: selftests: arm64: Skip sea_to_user without 1GB hugepages ---
> commit 5fa5666824342b3dd28a5ef6a04bb5ac183257c8
> Author: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>
>
> KVM: selftests: arm64: Skip sea_to_user without 1GB hugepages
>
> This commit adds a check to skip the sea_to_user test if the host does not
> have enough 1GB hugepages available, preventing a hard failure on systems
> without an empty pool.
>
> [ ... ]
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/test_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/test_util.c
>> index bab1bd2b775b6..29f9c1d60b1b7 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/test_util.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/test_util.c
>> @@ -222,6 +222,21 @@ size_t get_def_hugetlb_pagesz(void)
>> TEST_FAIL("Error in reading /proc/meminfo");
>> }
>>
>> +size_t get_free_hugepages(size_t page_size)
>> +{
>> + char path[128];
>> + size_t free;
>> +
>> + snprintf(path, sizeof(path),
>> + "/sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-%zukB/free_hugepages",
>> + page_size >> 10);
>> + if (!test_sysfs_path(path))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + free = get_sysfs_val(path);
>> + return free * page_size;
>
> [Severity: Medium]
> Does this calculation overestimate the available hugepages by ignoring the
> reserved pool?
>
> The sysfs free_hugepages value includes pages that are already committed to
> other mappings but not yet allocated (which are tracked via resv_hugepages).
>
> If the test runs on a host where free_hugepages meets the VM_MEM_SIZE
> requirement but some or all of those pages are reserved, the test will
> incorrectly proceed and still crash with an -ENOMEM abort instead of cleanly
> skipping.
>
> Could we also read and subtract resv_hugepages to determine the actual
> allocatable count?
For any human to double check:
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/sea_to_user.c
b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/sea_to_user.c
index 1c2a743ca8e23..7cf95da8e594d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/sea_to_user.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/sea_to_user.c
@@ -281,6 +281,12 @@ static struct kvm_vm
*vm_create_with_sea_handler(struct kvm_vcpu **vcpu)
alignment = max(backing_page_size, guest_page_size);
num_guest_pages = VM_MEM_SIZE / guest_page_size;
+ /*
+ * The region is backed by 1GB hugepages; skip gracefully rather than
+ * failing with mmap() -ENOMEM if the host has none reserved.
+ */
+ TEST_REQUIRE(get_free_hugepages(backing_page_size) >= VM_MEM_SIZE);
+
vm = __vm_create_with_one_vcpu(vcpu, num_guest_pages, guest_code);
vm_init_descriptor_tables(vm);
vcpu_init_descriptor_tables(*vcpu);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/test_util.h
b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/test_util.h
index a56271c237ae9..0624922c2735d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/test_util.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/test_util.h
@@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ struct vm_mem_backing_src_alias {
bool thp_configured(void);
size_t get_trans_hugepagesz(void);
size_t get_def_hugetlb_pagesz(void);
+size_t get_free_hugepages(size_t page_size);
const struct vm_mem_backing_src_alias *vm_mem_backing_src_alias(u32 i);
size_t get_backing_src_pagesz(u32 i);
bool is_backing_src_hugetlb(u32 i);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/test_util.c
b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/test_util.c
index bab1bd2b775b6..3bff9d825e8af 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/test_util.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/test_util.c
@@ -222,6 +222,32 @@ size_t get_def_hugetlb_pagesz(void)
TEST_FAIL("Error in reading /proc/meminfo");
}
+size_t get_free_hugepages(size_t page_size)
+{
+ char path[128];
+ size_t free, resv;
+
+ snprintf(path, sizeof(path),
+ "/sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-%zukB/free_hugepages",
+ page_size >> 10);
+ if (!test_sysfs_path(path))
+ return 0;
+ free = get_sysfs_val(path);
+
+ /*
+ * free_hugepages still counts pages that are reserved by existing
+ * mappings but not yet faulted in, so only free minus resv can back a
+ * new reservation (see available_huge_pages() in mm/hugetlb.c). Ignore
+ * surplus/overcommit: it does not apply to gigantic pages at runtime.
+ */
+ snprintf(path, sizeof(path),
+ "/sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-%zukB/resv_hugepages",
+ page_size >> 10);
+ resv = test_sysfs_path(path) ? get_sysfs_val(path) : 0;
+
+ return free > resv ? (free - resv) * page_size : 0;
+}
+
#define ANON_FLAGS (MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS)
#define ANON_HUGE_FLAGS (ANON_FLAGS | MAP_HUGETLB)
>
>> +}
>> +
>> #define ANON_FLAGS (MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS)
>> #define ANON_HUGE_FLAGS (ANON_FLAGS | MAP_HUGETLB)
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-18 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-18 11:29 [PATCH v2 0/3] KVM: selftests: arm64: Make sea_to_user skip cleanly Like Xu
2026-08-18 11:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: selftests: arm64: Fix EINJ handling in sea_to_user Like Xu
2026-08-18 11:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: selftests: arm64: Skip sea_to_user without 1GB hugepages Like Xu
2026-08-18 11:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 12:49 ` Like Xu [this message]
2026-08-18 11:29 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: selftests: arm64: Skip sea_to_user when EINJ places no poison Like Xu
2026-08-18 11:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 12:50 ` Like Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4f7023b4-dd7a-47cb-9754-52e6d41d3aa1@gmail.com \
--to=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox