From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V4 2/3] kvm: Note down when cpu relax intercepted
 or pause loop exited
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:22:00 +0300
Message-ID: <500520A8.50106@redhat.com>
References: <20120716082445.23477.15128.sendpatchset@codeblue.in.ibm.com> <20120716082514.23477.23849.sendpatchset@codeblue.in.ibm.com> <5003E682.20909@redhat.com> <50044E58.60905@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Srikar <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	S390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, chegu vinod <chegu_vinod@hp.com>,
	"Andrew M. Theurer" <habanero@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, X86 <x86@kernel.org>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>, linux390@de.ibm.com,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <srivatsa.vaddagiri@gmail.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
To: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <50044E58.60905@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

On 07/16/2012 08:24 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> So are you saying allow vcpu to spin in non over-commit scenarios? So
> that we avoid all yield_to etc...
> 
> ( Or even in some other place where it is useful).

When is yielding useful, if you're not overcommitted?



-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function