From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
Cc: nyh@math.technion.ac.il, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Nested kvm_intel broken on pre 3.3 hosts
Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 12:18:13 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <501E3A55.9080002@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1343991434-8241-1-git-send-email-stefan.bader@canonical.com>
On 08/03/2012 01:57 PM, Stefan Bader wrote:
>> No, you're backporting the entire feature. All we need is to expose
>> RDPMC intercept to the guest.
>
> Oh well, I thought that was the thing you asked for...
Sorry for being unclear.
>
>> It should be sufficient to backport the bits in
>> nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs() and nested_vmx_exit_handled().
>
> Ok, how about that? It is probably wrong again, but at least it
> allows to load the kvm-intel module from within a nested guest
> and not having the feature pretend to fail seems the closest
> thing to do...
>
> ---
>
> From 0aeb99348363b7aeb2b0bd92428cb212159fa468 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:57:25 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Fake intercept RDPMC
>
> Based on commit fee84b079d5ddee2247b5c1f53162c330c622902 upstream.
>
> Intercept RDPMC and forward it to the PMU emulation code.
>
> But drop the requirement for the feature being present and instead
> of forwarding, cause a GP as if the call had failed.
>
> BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1031090
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index 7315488..fc937f2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -1956,6 +1956,7 @@ static __init void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(void)
> #endif
> CPU_BASED_MOV_DR_EXITING | CPU_BASED_UNCOND_IO_EXITING |
> CPU_BASED_USE_IO_BITMAPS | CPU_BASED_MONITOR_EXITING |
> + CPU_BASED_RDPMC_EXITING |
> CPU_BASED_ACTIVATE_SECONDARY_CONTROLS;
> /*
> * We can allow some features even when not supported by the
> @@ -4613,6 +4614,14 @@ static int handle_invlpg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return 1;
> }
>
> +static int handle_rdpmc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + /* Instead of implementing the feature, cause a GP */
> + kvm_complete_insn_gp(vcpu, 1);
> +
> + return 1;
> +}
In fact this should never be called, since we never request RDPMC
exiting for L1.
> +
> static int handle_wbinvd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
> @@ -5563,6 +5572,7 @@ static int (*kvm_vmx_exit_handlers[])(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) = {
> [EXIT_REASON_HLT] = handle_halt,
> [EXIT_REASON_INVD] = handle_invd,
> [EXIT_REASON_INVLPG] = handle_invlpg,
> + [EXIT_REASON_RDPMC] = handle_rdpmc,
> [EXIT_REASON_VMCALL] = handle_vmcall,
> [EXIT_REASON_VMCLEAR] = handle_vmclear,
> [EXIT_REASON_VMLAUNCH] = handle_vmlaunch,
>
Provided you backport the bit in nested_vmx_exit_handled(). That takes
the L2->L1 RDPMC exit and forwards it to L1.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-05 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-01 11:29 Nested kvm_intel broken on pre 3.3 hosts Stefan Bader
2012-08-01 13:39 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-08-01 14:08 ` Avi Kivity
2012-08-01 14:26 ` Stefan Bader
2012-08-01 14:29 ` Avi Kivity
2012-08-01 15:07 ` Nadav Har'El
2012-08-01 15:10 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-08-01 15:11 ` Avi Kivity
2012-08-02 15:19 ` Stefan Bader
2012-08-02 15:19 ` [PATCH 1/7] KVM: Move cpuid code to new file Stefan Bader
2012-08-02 15:19 ` [PATCH 2/7] KVM: expose latest Intel cpu new features (BMI1/BMI2/FMA/AVX2) to guest Stefan Bader
2012-08-02 15:19 ` [PATCH 3/7] KVM: Expose kvm_lapic_local_deliver() Stefan Bader
2012-08-02 15:19 ` [PATCH 4/7] KVM: Expose a version 2 architectural PMU to a guests Stefan Bader
2012-08-02 15:19 ` [PATCH 5/7] KVM: Add generic RDPMC support Stefan Bader
2012-08-02 15:19 ` [PATCH 6/7] KVM: SVM: Intercept RDPMC Stefan Bader
2012-08-02 15:19 ` [PATCH 7/7] KVM: VMX: " Stefan Bader
2012-08-02 15:26 ` Nested kvm_intel broken on pre 3.3 hosts Avi Kivity
2012-08-03 10:55 ` (unknown), Stefan Bader
2012-08-03 10:57 ` Nested kvm_intel broken on pre 3.3 hosts Stefan Bader
2012-08-05 9:18 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2012-08-06 14:40 ` Stefan Bader
2012-08-09 7:13 ` Stefan Bader
2012-08-09 9:34 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=501E3A55.9080002@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nyh@math.technion.ac.il \
--cc=stefan.bader@canonical.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).