From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, mtosatti@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 4/4] KVM: emulator: optimize "rep ins" handling.
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 11:50:20 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <501F854C.6070005@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1343659101-24877-5-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com>
On 07/30/2012 05:38 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> Optimize "rep ins" by allowing emulator to write back more than one
> datum at a time. Introduce new operand type OP_MEM_STR which tells
> writeback() that dst contains pointer to an array that should be written
> back as opposite to just one data element.
>
> }
>
> - memcpy(dest, rc->data + rc->pos, size);
> - rc->pos += size;
> + if (ctxt->rep_prefix && !(ctxt->eflags & EFLG_DF)) {
> + ctxt->dst.data = rc->data + rc->pos;
> + ctxt->dst.type = OP_MEM_STR;
> + ctxt->dst.count = (rc->end - rc->pos) / size;
> + rc->pos = rc->end;
Should take into account the segment limit.
> + } else {
> + memcpy(dest, rc->data + rc->pos, size);
> + rc->pos += size;
> + }
> return 1;
> }
>
> @@ -1500,6 +1507,14 @@ static int writeback(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
> return rc;
> break;
> + case OP_MEM_STR:
> + rc = segmented_write(ctxt,
> + ctxt->dst.addr.mem,
> + ctxt->dst.data,
> + ctxt->dst.bytes * ctxt->dst.count);
> + if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
> + return rc;
> + break;
> case OP_XMM:
> write_sse_reg(ctxt, &ctxt->dst.vec_val, ctxt->dst.addr.xmm);
> break;
> @@ -2732,7 +2747,7 @@ int emulator_task_switch(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
> static void string_addr_inc(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, int reg,
> struct operand *op)
> {
> - int df = (ctxt->eflags & EFLG_DF) ? -1 : 1;
> + int df = (ctxt->eflags & EFLG_DF) ? -op->count : op->count;
>
> register_address_increment(ctxt, &ctxt->regs[reg], df * op->bytes);
> op->addr.mem.ea = register_address(ctxt, ctxt->regs[reg]);
> @@ -3672,7 +3687,7 @@ static struct opcode opcode_table[256] = {
> I(DstReg | SrcMem | ModRM | Src2Imm, em_imul_3op),
> I(SrcImmByte | Mov | Stack, em_push),
> I(DstReg | SrcMem | ModRM | Src2ImmByte, em_imul_3op),
> - I2bvIP(DstDI | SrcDX | Mov | String, em_in, ins, check_perm_in), /* insb, insw/insd */
> + I2bvIP(DstDI | SrcDX | Mov | String | Unaligned, em_in, ins, check_perm_in), /* insb, insw/insd */
Eww.
> I2bvIP(SrcSI | DstDX | String, em_out, outs, check_perm_out), /* outsb, outsw/outsd */
> /* 0x70 - 0x7F */
> X16(D(SrcImmByte)),
> @@ -3930,6 +3945,7 @@ static int decode_operand(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, struct operand *op,
> register_address(ctxt, ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RDI]);
> op->addr.mem.seg = VCPU_SREG_ES;
> op->val = 0;
> + op->count = 1;
> break;
> case OpDX:
> op->type = OP_REG;
> @@ -3973,6 +3989,7 @@ static int decode_operand(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, struct operand *op,
> register_address(ctxt, ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RSI]);
> op->addr.mem.seg = seg_override(ctxt);
> op->val = 0;
> + op->count = 1;
> break;
> case OpImmFAddr:
> op->type = OP_IMM;
> @@ -4513,8 +4530,14 @@ writeback:
> string_addr_inc(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RDI, &ctxt->dst);
>
> if (ctxt->rep_prefix && (ctxt->d & String)) {
> + unsigned int count;
> struct read_cache *r = &ctxt->io_read;
> - register_address_increment(ctxt, &ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX], -1);
> + if ((ctxt->d & SrcMask) == SrcSI)
> + count = ctxt->src.count;
> + else
> + count = ctxt->dst.count;
Does this work correctly for 'rep movs' and friends?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-06 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-30 14:38 [PATCHv5 0/4] improve speed of "rep ins" emulation Gleb Natapov
2012-07-30 14:38 ` [PATCHv5 1/4] Provide userspace IO exit completion callback Gleb Natapov
2012-08-02 19:26 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-08-05 14:49 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-07-30 14:38 ` [PATCHv5 2/4] KVM: emulator: make x86 emulation modes enum instead of defines Gleb Natapov
2012-07-30 14:38 ` [PATCHv5 3/4] KVM: emulator: string_addr_inc() cleanup Gleb Natapov
2012-07-30 14:38 ` [PATCHv5 4/4] KVM: emulator: optimize "rep ins" handling Gleb Natapov
2012-08-05 15:03 ` Avi Kivity
2012-08-05 15:18 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-08-05 15:20 ` Avi Kivity
2012-08-06 8:50 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2012-08-06 8:58 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-08-06 9:28 ` Avi Kivity
2012-08-06 11:05 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-08-06 11:39 ` Avi Kivity
2012-08-06 11:49 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-08-06 12:08 ` Avi Kivity
2012-08-07 12:07 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-08-13 14:39 ` [PATCHv5 0/4] improve speed of "rep ins" emulation Richard W.M. Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=501F854C.6070005@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).