From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] qom: introduce reclaimer to release obj Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 12:15:25 +0300 Message-ID: <50222E2D.7050300@redhat.com> References: <1344407156-25562-1-git-send-email-qemulist@gmail.com> <1344407156-25562-4-git-send-email-qemulist@gmail.com> <50222BC7.4060809@redhat.com> <50222C3B.1010302@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Liu Ping Fan , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Anthony Liguori , Jan Kiszka , Marcelo Tosatti , Stefan Hajnoczi , Blue Swirl , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= To: Paolo Bonzini Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50871 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752556Ab2HHJPg (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Aug 2012 05:15:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <50222C3B.1010302@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 08/08/2012 12:07 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 08/08/2012 11:05, Avi Kivity ha scritto: >>> > From: Liu Ping Fan >>> > >>> > Collect unused object and release them at caller demand. >>> > >> Please explain the motivation for this patch. > > It's poor man RCU, I think? I thought that it was to defer destructors (finalizers) to a more suitable context. But why is the unref context unsuitable? I don't see how it relates to RCU, where is the C and the U? Anyway the list eagerly awaits the explanation. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function