kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty.russell@linaro.org>,
	Christoffer Dall <c.dall@virtualopensystems.com>,
	"kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
	kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/5] Making KVM_GET_ONE_REG/KVM_SET_ONE_REG generic.
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 18:35:54 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5048C2DA.4050104@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA89Q=8P3Yg8SvqYhea_ZcWiMAkw=huVT7wfPFbpNTFttg@mail.gmail.com>

On 09/06/2012 06:23 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 6 September 2012 16:16, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> wrote:
>> (and the APIC, if treated as one-large-register) is 4k)
> 
> ...so don't do that then. Trying to treat the whole APIC
> as a single "register" means you don't get any of the
> advantages of "does this kernel support this register?"
> etc. Is there some reason I'm not seeing why it would
> make sense to do it that way?

It's just the easiest path forward.

"one large register" is mainly useful if registers have
interdependencies.  That doesn't exist in the APIC AFAIR, but it does
exist elsewhere.  Another way to handle interdependencies is to defer
applying the changes until a KVM_RUN, and then evaluate them as a group.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-06 15:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-28 23:37 [RFC 0/5] Making KVM_GET_ONE_REG/KVM_SET_ONE_REG generic Rusty Russell
2012-08-28 23:45 ` [RFC 1/5] KVM: Move KVM_SET_ONE_REG/KVM_GET_ONE_REG to generic code Rusty Russell
2012-09-01  9:11   ` Avi Kivity
2012-09-01 10:18     ` Peter Maydell
2012-09-01 10:44       ` Avi Kivity
2012-08-28 23:46 ` [RFC 2/5] KVM: ARM: use KVM_SET_ONE_REG/KVM_GET_ONE_REG Rusty Russell
2012-08-29 15:10   ` Christoffer Dall
2012-08-28 23:47 ` [RFC 3/5] KVM: Add KVM_VCPU_GET_REG_LIST Rusty Russell
2012-08-29 15:13   ` Christoffer Dall
2012-08-28 23:47 ` [RFC 4/5] KVM: ARM: Use KVM_VCPU_GET_REG_LIST Rusty Russell
2012-08-29 15:14   ` Christoffer Dall
2012-08-28 23:48 ` [RFC 5/5] KVM: ARM: Access all registers via KVM_GET_ONE_REG/KVM_SET_ONE_REG Rusty Russell
2012-08-29 15:29   ` Christoffer Dall
2012-09-01  9:14     ` Avi Kivity
2012-08-29 15:36   ` Peter Maydell
2012-08-29 18:21     ` Rusty Russell
2012-09-01  9:16       ` Avi Kivity
2012-09-01 10:25         ` Peter Maydell
2012-09-01 19:40           ` Christoffer Dall
2012-09-04 13:09             ` Peter Maydell
2012-09-04 14:29               ` Christoffer Dall
2012-09-05  6:37                 ` Rusty Russell
2012-08-29 18:16   ` Rusty Russell
2012-08-29 16:30 ` [RFC 0/5] Making KVM_GET_ONE_REG/KVM_SET_ONE_REG generic Peter Maydell
2012-08-29 18:39   ` Rusty Russell
2012-09-01  9:21     ` Avi Kivity
2012-09-01 12:35       ` Rusty Russell
2012-09-03  9:20         ` Avi Kivity
2012-09-03 12:33           ` Rusty Russell
2012-09-03 12:49             ` Peter Maydell
2012-09-04 11:48             ` Avi Kivity
2012-09-04 13:59               ` Alexander Graf
2012-09-06 14:44                 ` Avi Kivity
2012-09-05  6:43               ` Rusty Russell
2012-09-01 12:28 ` Rusty Russell
2012-09-01 12:37   ` Rusty Russell
2012-09-04 13:31   ` Peter Maydell
2012-09-05  3:15     ` Alexander Graf
2012-09-05  6:48     ` Rusty Russell
2012-09-05  8:52       ` Peter Maydell
2012-09-06  1:44         ` Rusty Russell
2012-09-06  7:37           ` Peter Maydell
2012-09-06 14:48       ` Avi Kivity
2012-09-06 15:08         ` Alexander Graf
2012-09-06 15:16           ` Avi Kivity
2012-09-06 15:23             ` Peter Maydell
2012-09-06 15:35               ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2012-09-06 23:00                 ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5048C2DA.4050104@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=c.dall@virtualopensystems.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=rusty.russell@linaro.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).