Re: [PATCH uq/master] kvm: Clean up irqfd API

Jan Kiszka
2012-09-10T09:27:21Z

On 2012-09-09 16:01, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 08/20/2012 11:55 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> No need to expose the fd-based interface, everyone will already be fine
>> with the more handy EventNotifier variant. Rename the latter to clarify
>> that we are still talking about irqfds here.
>
> Thanks, applied.
>
>>
>> -int kvm_irqchip_add_irqfd(KVMState *s, int fd, int virq);
>> -int kvm_irqchip_remove_irqfd(KVMState *s, int fd, int virq);
>> -int kvm_irqchip_add_irq_notifier(KVMState *s, EventNotifier *n, int virq);
>> -int kvm_irqchip_remove_irq_notifier(KVMState *s, EventNotifier *n, int virq);
>> +int kvm_irqchip_add_irqfd_notifier(KVMState *s, EventNotifier *n, int virq);
>> +int kvm_irqchip_remove_irqfd_notifier(KVMState *s, EventNotifier *n, int virq);
>> #endif
>
> Those names aren't particularly satisfying. add_irqfd_notifier implies
> you want to be notified about irqfd events, but that's not what the
> function does. Not sure what a good name would be.

Now that there are no more variants, we could also drop the "notifier"
from the name again. Better?

Jan

--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux