From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: "Hao, Xudong" <xudong.hao@intel.com>
Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Zhang, Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang@intel.com>,
"Joerg.Roedel@amd.com" <Joerg.Roedel@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kvm/fpu: Enable fully eager restore kvm FPU
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:54:17 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <504EEE29.9040309@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <403610A45A2B5242BD291EDAE8B37D300FEBF5A2@SHSMSX102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On 09/11/2012 09:43 AM, Hao, Xudong wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Avi Kivity [mailto:avi@redhat.com]
>> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 4:07 PM
>> To: Hao, Xudong
>> Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org; Zhang, Xiantao; Joerg.Roedel@amd.com
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kvm/fpu: Enable fully eager restore kvm FPU
>>
>> >
>> > Avi, I'm not sure if I fully understand of you. Do you mean enter guest with a
>> fpu_active=0 and then fpu does not restore?
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> > If so, I will add fpu_active=1 in the no-lazy case.
>> >
>> > - kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_DEACTIVATE_FPU, vcpu);
>> > + if (kvm_read_cr4_bits(vcpu, X86_CR4_OSXSAVE) &&
>> > + (vcpu->arch.xcr0 & ~((u64)KVM_XSTATE_LAZY))) {
>> > + kvm_x86_ops->fpu_activate(vcpu);
>> > + vcpu->fpu_active=1;
>> > + }
>> > + else
>> > + kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_DEACTIVATE_FPU, vcpu);
>> >
>>
>> It doesn't help here.
>>
>> 1 guest boot
>> 2 kvm_userspace_exit (deactivates fpu)
>> 3 XSETBV exit that sets xcr0.new_bit
>> 4 kvm_enter
>>
>> There is no call to kvm_put_guest_fpu() between 3 and 4, you need
>> something in __kvm_set_xcr() to activate the fpu.
>>
>
> Yes, it's code path when enable xsave in guest, I'll add fpu activate there and remain v2 patch in kvm_put_guest_fpu().
>
> @@ -554,6 +554,8 @@ int __kvm_set_xcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index, u64 xcr)
> xcr0 = xcr;
> if (kvm_x86_ops->get_cpl(vcpu) != 0)
> return 1;
> + if (xcr0 & ~((u64)KVM_XSTATE_LAZY))
> + kvm_x86_ops->fpu_activate(vcpu);
> if (!(xcr0 & XSTATE_FP))
> return 1;
> if ((xcr0 & XSTATE_YMM) && !(xcr0 & XSTATE_SSE))
>
>> Note you also need to consider writes to xcr0 and cr4 that happen in the
>> reverse order due to live migration.
>>
>
> I'm confused of this, doesn't setting cr4 firstly then xcr0?
> Do you mean current live migration has a reverse order, or it must be a reverse order with my eager restore patch?
I mean I want the code to work regardless of whether KVM_SET_SREGS or
KVM_SET_XCRS is called first.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-11 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-05 1:26 [PATCH v2] kvm/fpu: Enable fully eager restore kvm FPU Xudong Hao
2012-09-05 13:12 ` Avi Kivity
2012-09-06 2:13 ` Hao, Xudong
2012-09-06 8:16 ` Avi Kivity
2012-09-10 3:29 ` Hao, Xudong
2012-09-10 8:07 ` Avi Kivity
2012-09-11 6:43 ` Hao, Xudong
2012-09-11 7:54 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2012-09-11 9:20 ` Hao, Xudong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=504EEE29.9040309@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=Joerg.Roedel@amd.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiantao.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox