From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rik van Riel Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] kvm: Be courteous to other VMs in overcommitted scenario in PLE handler Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 09:22:35 -0400 Message-ID: <505C6A1B.5050001@redhat.com> References: <20120921115942.27611.67488.sendpatchset@codeblue> <20120921120019.27611.66093.sendpatchset@codeblue> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Peter Zijlstra , "H. Peter Anvin" , Marcelo Tosatti , Ingo Molnar , Avi Kivity , Srikar , "Nikunj A. Dadhania" , KVM , Jiannan Ouyang , chegu vinod , "Andrew M. Theurer" , LKML , Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Gleb Natapov To: Raghavendra K T Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120921120019.27611.66093.sendpatchset@codeblue> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 09/21/2012 08:00 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote: > From: Raghavendra K T > > When PLE handler fails to find a better candidate to yield_to, it > goes back and does spin again. This is acceptable when we do not > have overcommit. > But in overcommitted scenarios (especially when we have large > number of small guests), it is better to yield. > > Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju > Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T Acked-by: Rik van Riel -- All rights reversed