From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] kvm: Handle undercommitted guest case in PLE
 handler
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 10:18:17 +0200
Message-ID: <50680049.5020206@redhat.com>
References: <20120921115942.27611.67488.sendpatchset@codeblue> <20120921120000.27611.71321.sendpatchset@codeblue> <505C654B.2050106@redhat.com> <505CA2EB.7050403@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <50607F1F.2040704@redhat.com> <5060851E.1030404@redhat.com> <506166B4.4010207@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <5061713D.5060406@redhat.com> <CAJocwcf+8u84_yDC-PK0Yni93YSTWzYvr69nq6b3pNv1MwVJzQ@mail.gmail.com> <50641356.5070008@redhat.com> <CAJocwcc19F+PtsQ5okGMvYeVnkEigpZRpwWY9JgeRPFqfcVoXA@mail.gmail.com> <506540C7.9070105@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Jiannan Ouyang <ouyang@cs.pitt.edu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Srikar <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, chegu vinod <chegu_vinod@hp.com>,
	"Andrew M. Theurer" <habanero@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <srivatsa.vaddagiri@gmail.com>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <506540C7.9070105@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

On 09/28/2012 08:16 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> 
>>
>>     +struct pv_sched_info {
>>     +       unsigned long   sched_bitmap;
> 
> Thinking, whether we need something similar to cpumask here?
> Only thing is we are representing guest (v)cpumask.
> 

DECLARE_BITMAP(sched_bitmap, KVM_MAX_VCPUS)

cpumask is for host masks, this is a guest mask.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function