From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: fix vcpu->mmio_fragments overflow
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 19:09:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50852972.305@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121022091615.GG29310@redhat.com>
On 10/22/2012 05:16 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 03:37:32PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> After commit b3356bf0dbb349 (KVM: emulator: optimize "rep ins" handling),
>> the pieces of io data can be collected and write them to the guest memory
>> or MMIO together.
>>
>> Unfortunately, kvm splits the mmio access into 8 bytes and store them to
>> vcpu->mmio_fragments. If the guest uses "rep ins" to move large data, it
>> will cause vcpu->mmio_fragments overflow
>>
>> The bug can be exposed by isapc (-M isapc):
>>
>> [23154.818733] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
>> [ ......]
>> [23154.858083] Call Trace:
>> [23154.859874] [<ffffffffa04f0e17>] kvm_get_cr8+0x1d/0x28 [kvm]
>> [23154.861677] [<ffffffffa04fa6d4>] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0xcda/0xe45 [kvm]
>> [23154.863604] [<ffffffffa04f5a1a>] ? kvm_arch_vcpu_load+0x17b/0x180 [kvm]
>>
>>
>> Actually, we can use one mmio_fragment to store a large mmio access for the
>> mmio access is always continuous then split it when we pass the mmio-exit-info
>> to userspace. After that, we only need two entries to store mmio info for
>> the cross-mmio pages access
>>
> I wonder can we put the data into coalesced mmio buffer instead of
If we put all mmio data into coalesced buffer, we should:
- ensure the userspace program uses KVM_REGISTER_COALESCED_MMIO to register
all mmio regions.
- even if the MMIO region is not used by emulated-device, it also need to be
registered.
It will breaks old version userspace program.
> exiting for each 8 bytes? Is it worth the complexity?
Simpler way is always better but i failed, so i appreciate your guys comments.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-22 11:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-19 7:37 [PATCH] KVM: x86: fix vcpu->mmio_fragments overflow Xiao Guangrong
2012-10-19 7:39 ` [PATCH] emulator test: add "rep ins" mmio access test Xiao Guangrong
2012-11-01 0:05 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-10-22 9:16 ` [PATCH] KVM: x86: fix vcpu->mmio_fragments overflow Gleb Natapov
2012-10-22 11:09 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2012-10-22 11:23 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-10-22 11:35 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-10-22 11:43 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-10-22 11:45 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-10-22 12:18 ` Avi Kivity
2012-10-22 12:45 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-10-22 12:53 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-10-22 12:55 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-10-22 12:58 ` Avi Kivity
2012-10-22 13:05 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-10-22 13:08 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-10-22 13:25 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-10-22 14:00 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-10-22 14:23 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-10-22 15:36 ` Avi Kivity
2012-10-22 12:58 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-10-22 12:55 ` Avi Kivity
2012-10-22 13:01 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-10-22 13:02 ` Avi Kivity
2012-10-22 13:05 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-10-22 12:56 ` Avi Kivity
2012-10-22 13:58 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50852972.305@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).