From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 RFC 2/3] kvm: Handle yield_to failure return code for potential undercommit case Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:38:27 +0200 Message-ID: <50911BC3.6080305@redhat.com> References: <20121029140621.15448.92083.sendpatchset@codeblue> <20121029140702.15448.56932.sendpatchset@codeblue> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Peter Zijlstra , "H. Peter Anvin" , Marcelo Tosatti , Ingo Molnar , Rik van Riel , Srikar , "Nikunj A. Dadhania" , KVM , Jiannan Ouyang , Chegu Vinod , "Andrew M. Theurer" , LKML , Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Gleb Natapov , Andrew Jones To: Raghavendra K T Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20121029140702.15448.56932.sendpatchset@codeblue> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 10/29/2012 04:07 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote: > From: Raghavendra K T > > Also we do not update last boosted vcpu in failure cases. > > #endif > + > void kvm_vcpu_on_spin(struct kvm_vcpu *me) > { > struct kvm *kvm = me->kvm; > @@ -1727,11 +1727,12 @@ void kvm_vcpu_on_spin(struct kvm_vcpu *me) > continue; > if (!kvm_vcpu_eligible_for_directed_yield(vcpu)) > continue; > - if (kvm_vcpu_yield_to(vcpu)) { > + > + yielded = kvm_vcpu_yield_to(vcpu); > + if (yielded > 0) > kvm->last_boosted_vcpu = i; > - yielded = 1; > + if (yielded) > break; > - } > } If yielded == -ESRCH, should we not try to yield to another vcpu? -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function