From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [Bug 42980] BUG in gfn_to_pfn_prot Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 16:15:38 +0200 Message-ID: <50A8ED8A.1070606@redhat.com> References: <20121117221045.986FC11F7E2@bugzilla.kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org To: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39205 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751954Ab2KROPl (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Nov 2012 09:15:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20121117221045.986FC11F7E2@bugzilla.kernel.org> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/18/2012 12:10 AM, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42980 > > > > > > --- Comment #18 from Ian Pilcher 2012-11-17 22:10:45 --- > (In reply to comment #11) >> A patch referencing this bug report has been merged in Linux v3.5-rc1: >> >> commit d8368af8b46b904def42a0f341d2f4f29001fa77 >> Author: Avi Kivity >> Date: Mon May 14 18:07:56 2012 +0300 >> >> KVM: Fix mmu_reload() clash with nested vmx event injection > > Silly question. Is this patch applicable to the physical host, the L1 guest > (virtualized hypervisor), or both? > The physical host. If you want to run a hypervisor in L2, you need to apply it to L1 as well. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function