From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/18] pvclock vsyscall support + KVM hypervisor support
 (v5)
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 13:03:00 +0400
Message-ID: <50AB4744.5040603@parallels.com>
References: <20121119215758.686768790@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: <mingo@kernel.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
	<jeremy@goop.org>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.parallels.com ([64.131.90.16]:32771 "EHLO mx2.parallels.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751513Ab2KTJDG (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 20 Nov 2012 04:03:06 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20121119215758.686768790@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 11/20/2012 01:57 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> This patchset, based on earlier work by Jeremy Fitzhardinge, implements
> paravirtual clock vsyscall support.
> 
> It should be possible to implement Xen support relatively easily.
> 
> It reduces clock_gettime from 500 cycles to 200 cycles
> on my testbox.
> 

There are no more significant objections from my side.
I will still try to go through it again today just in case.