From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Guest performance is reduced after live migration
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 11:31:25 +0800
Message-ID: <50AC4B0D.7040602@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References: <AF8F7CA61C57594089A6FF49A1B453A503EBDC64A78F@EXMAIL02.jp.ykgw.net> <5091FE5E.4050004@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <AF8F7CA61C57594089A6FF49A1B453A503EBDBD87D34@EXMAIL02.jp.ykgw.net> <AF8F7CA61C57594089A6FF49A1B453A503EBDC72FF75@EXMAIL02.jp.ykgw.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Shouta.Uehara@jp.yokogawa.com
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from e28smtp04.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.4]:52580 "EHLO
	e28smtp04.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753953Ab2KUDbe (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 20 Nov 2012 22:31:34 -0500
Received: from /spool/local
	by e28smtp04.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted
	for <kvm@vger.kernel.org> from <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>;
	Wed, 21 Nov 2012 09:01:31 +0530
Received: from d28av02.in.ibm.com (d28av02.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.64])
	by d28relay04.in.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id qAL3VQDt8323446
	for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 09:01:26 +0530
Received: from d28av02.in.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1])
	by d28av02.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id qAL8xISx017363
	for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 19:59:18 +1100
In-Reply-To: <AF8F7CA61C57594089A6FF49A1B453A503EBDC72FF75@EXMAIL02.jp.ykgw.net>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 11/21/2012 09:25 AM, Shouta.Uehara@jp.yokogawa.com wrote:
> Dear allI
> 
> I continue watching a mailing list whether a similar problem is reported because a problem does not seem to happen to others.
> Any information, however small, would be appreciated.
> 

I am digging into it, but did not get useful hint so far...