From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] KVM: x86: let reexecute_instruction work for tdp
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:13:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50B42FC7.2080805@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121126223712.GA10634@amt.cnet>
On 11/27/2012 06:37 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 07:59:10AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> Currently, reexecute_instruction refused to retry all instructions. If
>> nested npt is used, the emulation may be caused by shadow page, it can
>> be fixed by dropping the shadow page
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 14 ++++++++------
>> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> index 7be8452..5fe72cc 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> @@ -4469,17 +4469,19 @@ static int handle_emulation_failure(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> return r;
>> }
>>
>> -static bool reexecute_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva)
>> +static bool reexecute_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr2)
>> {
>> - gpa_t gpa;
>> + gpa_t gpa = cr2;
>> pfn_t pfn;
>>
>> - if (tdp_enabled)
>> + if (!ACCESS_ONCE(vcpu->kvm->arch.indirect_shadow_pages))
>> return false;
>
> How is indirect_shadow_pages protected? Why is ACCESS_ONCE() being used
> to read it?
Hi Marcelo,
It is protected by mmu-lock for it only be changed when mmu-lock is hold. And
ACCESS_ONCE is used on read path avoiding magic optimization from compiler.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-27 3:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-19 23:57 [PATCH 0/3] KVM: x86: improve reexecute_instruction Xiao Guangrong
2012-11-19 23:58 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: x86: clean up reexecute_instruction Xiao Guangrong
2012-11-20 12:11 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-11-20 20:13 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-11-19 23:59 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: x86: let reexecute_instruction work for tdp Xiao Guangrong
2012-11-26 22:37 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-11-27 3:13 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2012-11-27 23:32 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-11-28 3:15 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-11-28 14:01 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-11-28 14:55 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-11-28 22:07 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-11-19 23:59 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: x86: improve reexecute_instruction Xiao Guangrong
2012-11-26 22:41 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-11-27 3:30 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-11-27 23:42 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-11-28 3:33 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-11-28 14:12 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-11-28 14:59 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-11-28 21:57 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-11-28 22:40 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-11-28 23:16 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-11-29 0:23 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-11-29 0:21 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-12-03 8:33 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-12-03 19:47 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-11-23 1:16 ` [PATCH 0/3] " Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50B42FC7.2080805@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).