From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Xiao Guangrong Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: MMU: lazily drop large spte Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 13:27:38 +0800 Message-ID: <50B5A0CA.8060807@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20121112231032.GB5798@amt.cnet> <50A20428.1030004@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20121114143747.GA7054@amt.cnet> <50A4267B.1030902@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20121116030222.GA21822@amt.cnet> <50A5B560.2070604@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20121116035655.GA27414@amt.cnet> <50A5C518.7030002@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20121116095752.GA21401@amt.cnet> <50A799DA.7050900@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20121118030040.GA5334@amt.cnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Avi Kivity , LKML , KVM To: Marcelo Tosatti Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20121118030040.GA5334@amt.cnet> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 11/18/2012 11:00 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: map gfn 4? See corrected step 7 above. >> >> Ah, this is a real bug, and unfortunately, it exists in current >> code. I will make a separate patchset to fix it. Thank you, Marcelo! > > Is it? Hum.. > > Anyway, it would be great if you can write a testcase (should be similar > in size to rmap_chain). Marcelo, is this patch acceptable?