public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] KVM: x86: clean up reexecute_instruction
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 15:20:24 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50E7D438.60709@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130104222135.GA13481@amt.cnet>

On 01/05/2013 06:21 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 09:55:40PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> Little cleanup for reexecute_instruction, also use gpa_to_gfn in
>> retry_instruction
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c |   13 ++++++-------
>>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> index 1c9c834..ad39018 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> @@ -4761,19 +4761,18 @@ static bool reexecute_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva)
>>  	if (tdp_enabled)
>>  		return false;
>>
>> +	gpa = kvm_mmu_gva_to_gpa_read(vcpu, gva, NULL);
>> +	if (gpa == UNMAPPED_GVA)
>> +		return true; /* let cpu generate fault */
>> +
> 
> Why change from _system to _read here? Purely cleanup patch should
> have no logical changes.

Ouch, my mistake, will drop this change.

> 
> BTW, there is not much logic in using reexecute_instruction() at
> for x86_decode_insn (checks in reexecute_instruction() assume 
> write to the cr2, for instance).
> Fault propagation for x86_decode_insn seems completly broken
> (which is perhaps why reexecute_instruction() there survived).

Currently, reexecute_instruction can work only if it is called on page
fault path where cr2 is valid. On other paths, cr2 is 0 which is always
not be mapped on guest since it is NULL pointer, so reexecute_instruction
always retry the instruction.

Yes, as you point it out, it is better if the fault address can be got
from x86_decode_insn. I will consider it later.



  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-05  7:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-04 13:53 [PATCH v4 0/5] KVM: x86: improve reexecute_instruction Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-04 13:54 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] KVM: MMU: fix Dirty bit missed if CR0.WP = 0 Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-04 13:54 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] KVM: MMU: fix infinite fault access retry Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-04 13:55 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] KVM: x86: clean up reexecute_instruction Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-04 22:21   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-01-05  7:20     ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2013-01-04 13:56 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] KVM: x86: let reexecute_instruction work for tdp Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-04 13:56 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] KVM: x86: improve reexecute_instruction Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-04 22:44   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-01-05  8:16     ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-07 20:46       ` Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50E7D438.60709@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox