From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] KVM: x86: clean up reexecute_instruction
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 15:20:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50E7D438.60709@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130104222135.GA13481@amt.cnet>
On 01/05/2013 06:21 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 09:55:40PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> Little cleanup for reexecute_instruction, also use gpa_to_gfn in
>> retry_instruction
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 13 ++++++-------
>> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> index 1c9c834..ad39018 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> @@ -4761,19 +4761,18 @@ static bool reexecute_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva)
>> if (tdp_enabled)
>> return false;
>>
>> + gpa = kvm_mmu_gva_to_gpa_read(vcpu, gva, NULL);
>> + if (gpa == UNMAPPED_GVA)
>> + return true; /* let cpu generate fault */
>> +
>
> Why change from _system to _read here? Purely cleanup patch should
> have no logical changes.
Ouch, my mistake, will drop this change.
>
> BTW, there is not much logic in using reexecute_instruction() at
> for x86_decode_insn (checks in reexecute_instruction() assume
> write to the cr2, for instance).
> Fault propagation for x86_decode_insn seems completly broken
> (which is perhaps why reexecute_instruction() there survived).
Currently, reexecute_instruction can work only if it is called on page
fault path where cr2 is valid. On other paths, cr2 is 0 which is always
not be mapped on guest since it is NULL pointer, so reexecute_instruction
always retry the instruction.
Yes, as you point it out, it is better if the fault address can be got
from x86_decode_insn. I will consider it later.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-05 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-04 13:53 [PATCH v4 0/5] KVM: x86: improve reexecute_instruction Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-04 13:54 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] KVM: MMU: fix Dirty bit missed if CR0.WP = 0 Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-04 13:54 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] KVM: MMU: fix infinite fault access retry Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-04 13:55 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] KVM: x86: clean up reexecute_instruction Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-04 22:21 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-01-05 7:20 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2013-01-04 13:56 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] KVM: x86: let reexecute_instruction work for tdp Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-04 13:56 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] KVM: x86: improve reexecute_instruction Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-04 22:44 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-01-05 8:16 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-07 20:46 ` Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50E7D438.60709@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox