From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Takuya Yoshikawa <takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com>
Cc: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
mtosatti@redhat.com, gleb@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] KVM: Reduce mmu_lock hold time when zapping mmu pages
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 21:45:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50FFE973.30709@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130123222846.05bfc05a91ee133bd25981d6@gmail.com>
On 01/23/2013 09:28 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 18:44:52 +0800
> Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> On 01/23/2013 06:12 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
>>> This patch set mitigates another mmu_lock hold time issue. Although
>>> this is not enough and I'm thinking of additional work already, this
>>> alone can reduce the lock hold time to some extent.
>>>
>>
>> It is not worth doing this kind of complex thing, usually, only a few pages on
>> the invalid list. The *really* heavily case is kvm_mmu_zap_all() which can be speeded
>> up by using generation number, this is a todo work in kvm wiki:
>
> I don't think this is so complex. This is a basic programming technique
> using linked lists.
I just consider that only a few page exist on the invalid list, no worth introducing
this.
>
> The current code which deletes the two link nodes in different functions
> looks unnatural to me: traversing the sp->link nodes forces us to break
> the loop and sp->hash_link nodes alone is allowed to continue ...
>
> Making each function semantically clear should be more important than
> other things.
>
The reason the code like this is, we have lockless shadow page walker.
> But maybe a matter of taste, so I'll wait for the maintainers' comments.
>
>> http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/TODO: O(1) mmu invalidation using a generation number
>>
>> I am doing this work for some weeks and will post the patch out during these days.
>
> I remember that Avi originally wrote the idea of introducing the
> generation of mmu pages in his other work.
>
Whatever the original consideration is, the idea can speed up mmu invalidation a lot.
(Actually, i mentioned this idea to you when discussion fast write protect long time ago.)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-23 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-23 10:12 [PATCH 0/8] KVM: Reduce mmu_lock hold time when zapping mmu pages Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-01-23 10:13 ` [PATCH 1/8] KVM: MMU: Fix and clean up for_each_gfn_* macros Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-01-28 12:24 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-01-28 12:29 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-01-23 10:13 ` [PATCH 2/8] KVM: MMU: Use list_for_each_entry_safe in kvm_mmu_commit_zap_page() Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-01-23 10:14 ` [PATCH 3/8] KVM: MMU: Add a parameter to kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page() to update the next position Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-01-23 10:15 ` [PATCH 4/8] KVM: MMU: Introduce for_each_gfn_indirect_valid_sp_safe macro Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-01-23 10:16 ` [PATCH 5/8] KVM: MMU: Delete hash_link node in kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page() Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-01-23 10:16 ` [PATCH 6/8] KVM: MMU: Introduce free_zapped_mmu_pages() for freeing mmu pages in a list Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-01-23 10:17 ` [PATCH 7/8] KVM: MMU: Split out free_zapped_mmu_pages() from kvm_mmu_commit_zap_page() Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-01-23 10:18 ` [PATCH 8/8] KVM: MMU: Move free_zapped_mmu_pages() out of the protection of mmu_lock Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-02-04 13:50 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-02-05 2:21 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-01-23 10:44 ` [PATCH 0/8] KVM: Reduce mmu_lock hold time when zapping mmu pages Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-23 13:28 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-01-23 13:45 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2013-01-23 14:49 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-01-23 15:45 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-02-04 13:42 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-02-05 5:30 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-02-04 13:29 ` Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50FFE973.30709@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com \
--cc=yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox