From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= Subject: Re: KVM call agenda for 2013-01-29 Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:02:25 +0100 Message-ID: <5107C861.1090007@suse.de> References: <87sj5lh8tf.fsf@elfo.elfo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Herv=E9_Poussineau?= , qemu-devel qemu-devel , KVM devel mailing list , Gerd Hoffmann To: Juan Quintela , Alexander Graf , Anthony Liguori Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87sj5lh8tf.fsf@elfo.elfo> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Am 28.01.2013 11:59, schrieb Juan Quintela: > Please send in any agenda topics you are interested in. I/O port rework: * Proposal by Herv=E9: move I/O port list registration to ISA http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2013-01/msg00508.html This causes modeling issues since PCI VGA/QXL then register I/O ports via ISADevice API (using NULL ISADevice* argument) and require an ISABus in machines that may not have one (e.g., New World Macs). (kind of a QOM multi-inheritence issue) Trivial conversion patches were reviewed by me and merged already. Remaining question is how to proceed conceptually and design-wise in lack of memory and ISA maintainers. Background is that ppc has no concept of PIO and needs a "forwarding" from PCI I/O MemoryRegion to PIO currently: http://git.qemu.org/?p=3Dqemu.git;a=3Dcommit;h=3Da178274efabcbbc5d44805b5= 1def874e47051325 http://git.qemu.org/?p=3Dqemu.git;a=3Dcommit;h=3Da3cfa18eb075c7ef78358ca1= 956fe7b01caa1724 Regards, Andreas --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=F6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=FCrnbe= rg