From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Kiszka Subject: Re: [Bug 53611] New: nVMX: Add nested EPT Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:53:44 +0100 Message-ID: <511905F8.2000703@siemens.com> References: <5118EF31.8000900@siemens.com> <20130211132730.GA24985@fermat.math.technion.ac.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" To: "Nadav Har'El" Return-path: Received: from goliath.siemens.de ([192.35.17.28]:32817 "EHLO goliath.siemens.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757461Ab3BKOxu (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2013 09:53:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20130211132730.GA24985@fermat.math.technion.ac.il> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2013-02-11 14:27, Nadav Har'El wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013, Jan Kiszka wrote about "Re: [Bug 53611] New: nVMX: Add nested EPT": >> On 2013-02-11 13:49, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: >>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53611 >>> Summary: nVMX: Add nested EPT > > Yikes, I didn't realize that these bugzilla edits all get spammed to the > entire mailing list :( Sorry about those... > >> I suppose they do not apply anymore as well. Do you have a recent tree >> around somewhere or plan to resume work on it? > > Unfortunately, no - I did not have time to work on these patches since > August. > > The reason I'm now stuffing these things into the bug tracker is that > at the end of this month I am leaving IBM to a new job, so I'm pretty > sure I won't have time myself to continue any work on nested VMX, and > would like for the missing nested-VMX features to be documented in case > someone else comes along and wants to improve it. So unfortunately, you > should expect more of this bugzilla spam on the mailing list... A pity that you cannot finish this great work. But documenting the open issues is definitely helpful and welcome. Best wishes, Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux