From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Borntraeger Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] kvm: Make ioeventfd usable on s390. Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:48:38 +0100 Message-ID: <512CBD36.6080003@de.ibm.com> References: <1361806070-62465-1-git-send-email-cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> <20130226110421.GB10915@redhat.com> <20130226111812.GA11111@redhat.com> <512CA6F3.7080203@de.ibm.com> <20130226134156.GA11665@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Carsten Otte , KVM , linux-s390 , Heiko Carstens , qemu-devel , Martin Schwidefsky , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130226134156.GA11665@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 26/02/13 14:41, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> So... >> Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger > > So let's apply the patch for 3.9 and Give us 1 or 2 days testing for regression and then this can go for 3.9. The host changes can then be deferred to a later point in time. > avoid caring about "old guests" much? Well caring about old guests is related to caring about malicious guests. Maybe we should make it explicit in the spec that the token can be wrong or omitted. Just to avoid that anybody starts to optimize things too aggressive. Ok? Christian