From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: nSVM/nVMX: Implement vmexit on INIT assertion
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 12:23:27 +0100
Message-ID: <512DECAF.7020600@siemens.com>
References: <512A1EF5.2070709@web.de> <20130225080024.GA411@fermat.math.technion.ac.il> <512B2932.5060909@web.de> <20130227112052.GG26252@8bytes.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Cc: "Nadav Har'El" <nyh@math.technion.ac.il>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
	"Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from thoth.sbs.de ([192.35.17.2]:23811 "EHLO thoth.sbs.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1757904Ab3B0LXh (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 27 Feb 2013 06:23:37 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20130227112052.GG26252@8bytes.org>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 2013-02-27 12:20, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:04:50AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Is the nested-related state already saved on AMD, J=F6rg? If not, ad=
ding
>> this one would not make things worse at least. Still, missing user s=
pace
>> save/restore already breaks reset, not only migration (dunno if this=
 is
>> better on AMD).
>=20
> Not sure if this is what you are asking for, but nested state is at n=
ot
> saved/restored for migration or anything. This is a long-standing iss=
ue
> which needs to be fixed at some point.

As I suspected. That needs to be solved at some point, but for now it
would not cause any regression to add another unsaved nested-related
state (here: "INIT asserted"). That was my questions.

Thanks,
Jan

--=20
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux