From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: KVM: x86: Racy mp_state manipulations
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2013 17:48:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51337EDD.40303@web.de> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1335 bytes --]
Hi all,
KVM's mp_state on x86 is usually manipulated over the context of the
VCPU. Therefore, no locking is required. There are unfortunately two
exceptions, and one of them is definitely broken: INIT and SIPI delivery.
The lapic may set mp_state over the context of the sending VCPU. For
SIPI, it first checks if the mp_state is INIT_RECEIVED before updating
it to SIPI_RECEIVED. We can only race here with user space setting the
state in parallel, I suppose. Probably harmless in practice.
What is critical is the update on INIT. That signal is asynchronous to
the target VCPU state. And we can loose it:
vcpu 1 vcpu 2
------ ------
hlt;
vmexit
__apic_accept_irq(APIC_DM_INIT)
mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED
mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_HALTED
And there it goes, our INIT state. I've triggered this under heavy INIT
load and my nVMX patch for processing it while in VMXON.
I'm currently considering options to fix this:
- through a lock at mp_state manipulations, check under the lock that
we don't perform invalid state transitions (e.g. INIT->HLT)
- signal the INIT via some KVM_REQ_INIT to the target VCPU, fully
localizing mp_state updates, the same could be done with SIPI, just
to play safe
I'm leaning toward the latter ATM, Any thoughts or other idea?
Jan
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 263 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2013-03-03 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-03 16:48 Jan Kiszka [this message]
2013-03-04 14:12 ` KVM: x86: Racy mp_state manipulations Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-04 14:28 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-04 15:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-04 15:19 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-05 7:28 ` Gleb Natapov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51337EDD.40303@web.de \
--to=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox