From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 0/8] pv event interface between host
	and guest
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 11:28:05 +0100
Message-ID: <51347735.9090204@redhat.com>
References: <cover.1362051581.git.hutao@cn.fujitsu.com>
	<20130303091738.GB23616@redhat.com> <513471F1.5020702@redhat.com>
	<20130304102131.GK23616@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, Hu Tao <hutao@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
	Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>, Orit Wasserman <owasserm@redhat.com>,
	Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Return-path: <qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130304102131.GK23616@redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org
Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

Il 04/03/2013 11:21, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
>> > Just to clarify it for Hu Tao, the read from a random ioport is how the
>> > ACPI code will detect presence of the device.
>> > 
> Actually no (at least in the long run, for the first version it may be
> OK).

Agreed.

> Since we want to move DSDT generation into QEMU if device will not
> be present QEMU will not generate corresponded Device() in DSDT, or it
> will generate it with _STA() { Return (0x00)} hard coded.

Yes, this would be good.

> Seabios can do
> the same if we will pass it info about device presence via fw_cfg.

True, but I don't like this a lot.  I don't like splitting decisions
between SeaBIOS and the DSDT, you end up touching code all over the
place and writing ASL is simpler than patching---even with all the
machinery that we have.  It is also simpler to move ASL from SeaBIOS to
OVMF and/or viceversa.  I don't recall what was the opposition to a
fw_cfg driver directly in the DSDT, but I think this would be a good
usage for it.

Splitting it between QEMU and DSDT is a bit better, since you have to
touch QEMU anyway to implement the feature.

Anyhow, this does not apply to the next submission of this series.  I
think we can agree to the compromise of using ACPI but still read the
port in _STA.

Paolo