From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: x86: Convert INIT and SIPI signals into synchronously handled requests
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 09:24:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5135ABC8.7090606@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130305075719.GV23616@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4244 bytes --]
On 2013-03-05 08:57, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 12:00:10AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2013-03-04 22:41, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
>>>
>>> A VCPU sending INIT or SIPI to some other VCPU races for setting the
>>> remote VCPU's mp_state. When we were unlucky, KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED
>>> was overwritten by kvm_emulate_halt and, thus, got lost.
>>>
>>> Fix this by raising requests on the sender side that will then be
>>> handled synchronously over the target VCPU context.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - check transition to INIT_RECEIVED in vcpu_enter_guest
>>> - removed return value of kvm_check_init_and_sipi - caller has to
>>> check for relevant transition afterward
>>> - add write barrier after setting sipi_vector
>>>
>>> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 11 ++++++-----
>>> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>>> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 2 ++
>>> 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
>>> index 02b51dd..7986c9f 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
>>> @@ -731,8 +731,7 @@ static int __apic_accept_irq(struct kvm_lapic *apic, int delivery_mode,
>>> case APIC_DM_INIT:
>>> if (!trig_mode || level) {
>>> result = 1;
>>> - vcpu->arch.mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED;
>>> - kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
>>> + kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_INIT, vcpu);
>>> kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
>>> } else {
>>> apic_debug("Ignoring de-assert INIT to vcpu %d\n",
>>> @@ -743,11 +742,13 @@ static int __apic_accept_irq(struct kvm_lapic *apic, int delivery_mode,
>>> case APIC_DM_STARTUP:
>>> apic_debug("SIPI to vcpu %d vector 0x%02x\n",
>>> vcpu->vcpu_id, vector);
>>> - if (vcpu->arch.mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED) {
>>> + if (vcpu->arch.mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED ||
>>> + test_bit(KVM_REQ_INIT, &vcpu->requests)) {
>>> result = 1;
>>> vcpu->arch.sipi_vector = vector;
>>> - vcpu->arch.mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_SIPI_RECEIVED;
>>> - kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
>>> + /* make sure sipi_vector is visible for the receiver */
>>> + smp_wmb();
>>> + kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_SIPI, vcpu);
>>> kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
>>> }
>>> break;
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>> index d0cf737..0be04b9 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>> @@ -5641,6 +5641,15 @@ static void update_eoi_exitmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>> kvm_x86_ops->load_eoi_exitmap(vcpu, eoi_exit_bitmap);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static void kvm_check_init_and_sipi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>> +{
>>> + if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_INIT, vcpu))
>>> + vcpu->arch.mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED;
>>
>> And here is a small race between clearing REQ_INIT and setting
>> INIT_RECEIVED. It can make the LAPIC drop the SIPI incorrectly. Need to
>> break up test and clear, doing the clear after mp_state update. Yeah...
>>
> You also need to call kvm_check_init_and_sipi() in
> kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_get_mpstate(),
Indeed.
> which means you now have three places
> where you transfer INIT/SIPI state from requests to mp_state. All the
> problems arise from the fact that now you have two places where you
> are storing current state.
Not at all. I'm keeping the state in a single place, mp_state. I just
have to make sure that I do not loose asynchronous events - what INIT
and SIPI are.
> To overcome this we can either deprecated
> KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED/KVM_MP_STATE_SIPI_RECEIVED values for mp_state
> (use it only for migration purposes) and use separate state in APIC
> to hold those event, like with nmi, or why not go with Paolo's simple
> cmpxchg one?
We need to replace most, if not all, manipulations of mp_state with
cmpxchg, verifying the state transitions there. And the request-based
approach still looks cleaner to me when it comes to implementing INIT
handling for nested modes. That will just trivially hook into
kvm_check_init_and_sipi.
Jan
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 263 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-05 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-04 21:41 [PATCH v2] KVM: x86: Convert INIT and SIPI signals into synchronously handled requests Jan Kiszka
2013-03-04 23:00 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-05 7:57 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-05 8:24 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2013-03-05 8:46 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-05 9:12 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-05 9:37 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-05 10:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-05 13:25 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-05 13:33 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-05 13:28 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-05 23:16 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-03-06 0:01 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-03-06 0:06 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-03-06 6:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 7:57 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-06 21:30 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-03-06 21:39 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-06 21:50 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-03-06 21:58 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-06 21:19 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-03-06 22:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 23:04 ` Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5135ABC8.7090606@web.de \
--to=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox