From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@freescale.com>,
Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: in-kernel interrupt controller steering
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 10:40:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51370F02.6010903@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130305152518.GH11223@redhat.com>
Il 05/03/2013 16:25, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
>> 1) We need to set the generic interrupt type of the system before we create vcpus.
>>
>> This is a new ioctl that sets the overall system interrupt controller type to a specific model. This used so that when we create vcpus, we can create the appended "local interrupt controller" state without the actual interrupt controller device available yet. It is also used later to switch between interrupt controller implementations.
>>
>> This interrupt type is write once and frozen after the first vcpu got created.
>
> Why explicit ioctl is needed? Why not require specific irqchip to be
> created before first vcpu. The device created determines system interrupt
> controller type.
QEMU creates CPUs before devices, and CPUs need to know what kind of
local interrupt controller to create. Similar to how in-kernel LAPIC
state is created long before the userspace device that proxies the LAPIC.
I think the above design makes sense. The alternative would be to
entirely separate the creation of CPUs and devices. You could even
support heterogeneous systems with some in-kernel irqchips and some
userspace irqchips; sounds cool, but useless too.
>> 7) Interrupt line connections to vcpus are implicit
>>
>> We don't explicitly mark which in-kernel irqchip interrupt line
>> goes to which vcpu. This is done implicitly. If we see a need for it, we
>> create a new irqchip device type that allows us to explicitly configure
>> vcpu connections.
>
> OK.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-06 9:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-04 22:20 in-kernel interrupt controller steering Alexander Graf
2013-03-05 0:59 ` Scott Wood
2013-03-05 5:44 ` Paul Mackerras
2013-03-05 15:25 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-06 9:40 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2013-03-06 9:58 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-06 10:04 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 10:12 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-06 10:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 10:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 11:26 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-06 11:44 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 11:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 11:47 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 11:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 11:58 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 13:16 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-06 11:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 11:46 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 11:59 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-06 12:02 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 12:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 12:20 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 12:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 13:14 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-06 13:22 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 13:56 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-06 14:03 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 14:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 14:30 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 14:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 14:40 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 14:41 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-06 14:48 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 14:59 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 15:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 15:30 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-06 16:33 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-07 0:32 ` Paul Mackerras
2013-03-07 7:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 13:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-06 14:11 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-06 14:31 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 18:46 ` Peter Maydell
2013-03-06 19:20 ` Alexander Graf
2013-03-06 0:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-03-06 0:33 ` Alexander Graf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51370F02.6010903@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=stuart.yoder@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox