kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Avi Kivity <avi.kivity@gmail.com>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Srikar <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Jiannan Ouyang <ouyang@cs.pitt.edu>,
	Chegu Vinod <chegu_vinod@hp.com>,
	"Andrew M. Theurer" <habanero@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <srivatsa.vaddagiri@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] kvm: Better yield_to candidate using preemption notifiers
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 12:43:08 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51398F84.5060808@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130307191059.GC15854@amt.cnet>

On 03/08/2013 12:40 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 11:31:46PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
>>   This patch series further filters better vcpu candidate to yield to
>> in PLE handler. The main idea is to record the preempted vcpus using
>> preempt notifiers and iterate only those preempted vcpus in the
>> handler. Note that the vcpus which were in spinloop during pause loop
>> exit are already filtered.
>>
>> Thanks Jiannan, Avi for bringing the idea and Gleb, PeterZ for
>> precious suggestions during the discussion.
>> Thanks Srikar for suggesting to avoid rcu lock while checking task state
>> that has improved overcommit cases.
>>
>> There are basically two approches for the implementation.
>>
>> Method 1: Uses per vcpu preempt flag (this series).
>>
>> Method 2: We keep a bitmap of preempted vcpus. using this we can easily
>> iterate over preempted vcpus.
>>
>> Note that method 2 needs an extra index variable to identify/map bitmap to
>> vcpu and it also needs static vcpu allocation.
>>
>> I am also posting Method 2 approach for reference in case it interests.
>>
>> Result: decent improvement for kernbench and ebizzy.
>>
>> base = 3.8.0 + undercommit patches
>> patched = base + preempt patches
>>
>> Tested on 32 core (no HT) mx3850 machine with 32 vcpu guest 8GB RAM
>>
>> --+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
>>                 kernbench (exec time in sec lower is beter)
>> --+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
>>        base       stdev       patched       stdev      %improve
>> --+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
>> 1x    47.0383     4.6977     44.2584     1.2899	    5.90986
>> 2x    96.0071     7.1873     91.2605     7.3567	    4.94401
>> 3x   164.0157    10.3613    156.6750    11.4267	    4.47561
>> 4x   212.5768    23.7326    204.4800    13.2908	    3.80888
>> --+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
>> no ple kernbench 1x result for reference: 46.056133
>>
>> --+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
>>                 ebizzy (record/sec higher is better)
>> --+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
>>        base       stdev       patched       stdev      %improve
>> --+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
>> 1x  5609.2000    56.9343    6263.7000    64.7097     11.66833
>> 2x  2071.9000   108.4829    2653.5000   181.8395     28.07085
>> 3x  1557.4167   109.7141    1993.5000   166.3176     28.00043
>> 4x  1254.7500    91.2997    1765.5000   237.5410     40.70532
>> --+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
>> no ple ebizzy 1x result for reference : 7394.9 rec/sec
>>
>> Please let me know if you have any suggestions and comments.
>>
>> Raghavendra K T (2):
>>     kvm: Record the preemption status of vcpus using preempt notifiers
>>     kvm: Iterate over only vcpus that are preempted
>
> Reviewed-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
>

Thank you Marcelo.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-08  7:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-04 18:01 [PATCH RFC 0/2] kvm: Better yield_to candidate using preemption notifiers Raghavendra K T
2013-03-04 18:02 ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] kvm: Record the preemption status of vcpus using preempt notifiers Raghavendra K T
2013-03-05 15:19   ` Chegu Vinod
2013-03-07  9:19     ` Raghavendra K T
2013-03-04 18:02 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] kvm: Iterate over only vcpus that are preempted Raghavendra K T
2013-03-05 15:20   ` Chegu Vinod
2013-03-05  9:53 ` [PATCH RFC 0/2] kvm: Better yield_to candidate using preemption notifiers Andrew Jones
2013-03-05 12:24   ` Raghavendra K T
2013-03-05 12:40     ` Andrew Jones
2013-03-07 19:10 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-03-08  7:13   ` Raghavendra K T [this message]
2013-03-11  9:38 ` Gleb Natapov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51398F84.5060808@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=avi.kivity@gmail.com \
    --cc=chegu_vinod@hp.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=habanero@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ouyang@cs.pitt.edu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=srivatsa.vaddagiri@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).